PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXUG vs. FID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TXUG vs. FID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg International Growth ETF (TXUG) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXUG achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 8.56% return.


TXUG

1D
-0.64%
1M
4.08%
YTD
9.55%
6M
9.59%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FID

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.56%
YTD
8.56%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXUG vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TXUG and FID is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.62

The correlation between TXUG and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXUG vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXUG
TXUG Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TXUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXUG Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TXUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXUG Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FID
FID Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXUG vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg International Growth ETF (TXUG) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TXUGFIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.41

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

2.62

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

9.14

-7.93

TXUG vs. FID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the FID Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXUG and FID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TXUGFIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

2.30

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.39

-0.11

Drawdowns

TXUG vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXUG drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXUG and FID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXUGFIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-39.79%

+21.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.93%

-8.93%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.11%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-8.47%

+4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

2.55%

+2.12%

Volatility

TXUG vs. FID - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg International Growth ETF (TXUG) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that TXUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXUGFIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

3.00%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

8.12%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.93%

10.16%

+6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

17.04%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

18.96%

+0.65%

TXUG vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison

TXUG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TXUG vs. FID - Dividend Comparison

TXUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
4.02%4.30%4.31%4.19%4.22%3.76%3.91%3.70%1.74%
TXUG
Thornburg International Growth ETF
0.47%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TXUG and FID have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TXUG has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXUG dropped -18.58% vs FID's -39.79%.

On 1-year performance, FID leads with 23.28% vs 5.65% for TXUG. On fees, FID is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FID has performed better with a 23.28% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FID is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TXUG.

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.47% for TXUG.

They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TXUG and 0.60% for FID.

FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXUG and FID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer