TXS vs. VFMV
TXS (Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. TXS is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past year, TXS returned 20.33% vs 13.49% for VFMV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TXS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
TXS vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TXS achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 8.76% return.
TXS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 13.49%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 20.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 13.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
TXS vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TXS Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF | 13.49% | 10.31% | 24.29% | 5.64% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.76% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between TXS and VFMV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between TXS and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
TXS vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TXS
VFMV
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
TXS
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
TXS
VFMV
Industrials
TXS
VFMV
Real Estate
TXS
VFMV
Technology
TXS
VFMV
Healthcare
TXS
VFMV
Financial Services
TXS
VFMV
Communication Services
TXS
VFMV
Utilities
TXS
VFMV
Consumer Defensive
TXS
VFMV
Basic Materials
TXS
VFMV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TXS vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
TXS
VFMV
TXS vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TXS | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 2.26 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 8.85 | +1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TXS | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 1.54 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.70 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
TXS vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TXS drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, smaller than the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXS and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TXS | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.69% | -33.64% | +13.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.54% | -6.00% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.81% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -3.64% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.53% | +0.37% |
Volatility
TXS vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) has a higher volatility of 2.16% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.04%. This indicates that TXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TXS | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.16% | 2.04% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 6.30% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 8.80% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 11.75% | +4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 14.25% | +1.64% |
TXS vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TXS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
TXS vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
TXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than VFMV's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TXS Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.82% | 0.86% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TXS and VFMV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TXS has higher volatility (2.16%) compared to VFMV (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXS dropped -19.69% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 1-year performance, TXS leads with 20.33% vs 13.49% for VFMV. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TXS has performed better with a 20.33% return vs 13.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for TXS.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.74% for TXS.
They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TXS and 0.13% for VFMV.
TXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TXS and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer