PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXS vs. QIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TXS vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXS achieves a 14.76% return, which is significantly higher than QIDX's 9.82% return.


TXS

1D
0.32%
1M
1.54%
6M
11.09%
YTD
14.76%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
18.81%
5Y*
10Y*

QIDX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.55%
6M
6.44%
YTD
9.82%
1Y
11.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXS vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TXS and QIDX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025

0.79

The correlation between TXS and QIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXS vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXS
TXS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

QIDX
QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXS vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TXSQIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.69

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

5.68

+3.26

TXS vs. QIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the QIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXS and QIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TXS vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXS drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, which is greater than QIDX's maximum drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXS and QIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXSQIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.69%

-14.99%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-6.92%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-0.72%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-2.17%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.06%

-0.13%

Volatility

TXS vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) is 2.06%, while Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) has a volatility of 2.51%. This indicates that TXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXSQIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

2.51%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

8.45%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

11.00%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

14.34%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

14.34%

+1.38%

TXS vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TXS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TXS vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison

TXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than QIDX's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QIDX
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
0.86%0.84%0.00%0.00%
TXS
Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF
0.79%0.82%0.86%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


TXS and QIDX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QIDX has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to TXS (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXS dropped -19.69% vs QIDX's -14.99%.

On 1-year performance, TXS leads with 17.15% vs 11.66% for QIDX. On fees, TXS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, TXS has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TXS has performed better with a 17.15% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TXS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QIDX.

QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.79% for TXS.

They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TXS and 0.50% for QIDX.

TXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXS and QIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer