PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXS vs. QIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TXS vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXS achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than QIDX's 8.20% return.


TXS

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
11.72%
6M
10.00%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QIDX

1D
0.34%
1M
1.63%
YTD
8.20%
6M
6.78%
1Y
11.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXS vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TXS and QIDX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025

0.79

The correlation between TXS and QIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXS vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXS
TXS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

QIDX
QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXS vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TXSQIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.70

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.92

5.63

+2.29

TXS vs. QIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the QIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXS and QIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TXS vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXS drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, which is greater than QIDX's maximum drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXS and QIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXSQIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.69%

-14.99%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-6.92%

+0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-0.95%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-2.24%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.09%

-0.16%

Volatility

TXS vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison

Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) at 2.94%. This indicates that TXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXSQIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.94%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

8.53%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

11.08%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

14.52%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.83%

14.52%

+1.31%

TXS vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TXS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TXS vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison

TXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than QIDX's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QIDX
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
0.85%0.84%0.00%0.00%
TXS
Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF
0.75%0.82%0.86%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


TXS and QIDX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TXS has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to QIDX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXS dropped -19.69% vs QIDX's -14.99%.

On 1-year performance, TXS leads with 15.28% vs 11.74% for QIDX. On fees, TXS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, QIDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TXS has performed better with a 15.28% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TXS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QIDX.

QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.75% for TXS.

They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TXS and 0.50% for QIDX.

TXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXS and QIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer