TXS vs. IMCB
TXS (Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF) and IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - TXS tracks the Texas Capital Texas Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross while IMCB tracks the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TXS returned 20.33% vs 24.38% for IMCB. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TXS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IMCB.
Performance
TXS vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TXS achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 15.52% return.
TXS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 13.49%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 20.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMCB
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 15.52%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
TXS vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TXS Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF | 13.49% | 10.31% | 24.29% | 5.64% |
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 15.52% | 10.25% | 15.10% | 4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between TXS and IMCB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between TXS and IMCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
TXS vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TXS
IMCB
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
TXS
IMCB
Consumer Cyclical
TXS
IMCB
Industrials
TXS
IMCB
Real Estate
TXS
IMCB
Technology
TXS
IMCB
Healthcare
TXS
IMCB
Financial Services
TXS
IMCB
Communication Services
TXS
IMCB
Utilities
TXS
IMCB
Consumer Defensive
TXS
IMCB
Basic Materials
TXS
IMCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TXS vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank
TXS
IMCB
TXS vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TXS | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 3.04 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 12.06 | -1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TXS | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 1.92 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.51 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
TXS vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TXS drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXS and IMCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TXS | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.69% | -58.80% | +39.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.54% | -8.05% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -7.73% | +4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 2.03% | -0.13% |
Volatility
TXS vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) is 2.16%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that TXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TXS | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.16% | 3.24% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 9.60% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 12.74% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 17.57% | -1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 19.64% | -3.75% |
TXS vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TXS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TXS vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison
TXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than IMCB's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.47% |
TXS Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.82% | 0.86% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TXS and IMCB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMCB has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to TXS (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXS dropped -19.69% vs IMCB's -58.80%.
On 1-year performance, IMCB leads with 24.38% vs 20.33% for TXS. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TXS has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 24.38% return vs 20.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for TXS.
IMCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.74% for TXS.
TXS tracks Texas Capital Texas Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TXS and 0.04% for IMCB.
IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TXS and IMCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer