PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXN vs. CSU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TXN vs. CSU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TXN is traded in USD, while CSU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CSU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXN achieves a 75.59% return, which is significantly higher than CSU.TO's -13.14% return. Over the past 10 years, TXN has outperformed CSU.TO with an annualized return of 20.39%, while CSU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.61% annualized return.


TXN

1D
1.35%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
75.59%
6M
69.78%
1Y
58.75%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*
20.39%

CSU.TO

1D
-4.56%
1M
13.22%
YTD
-13.14%
6M
-12.17%
1Y
-41.00%
3Y*
0.71%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
18.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXN vs. CSU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
75.59%-4.47%13.14%6.41%-9.86%17.53%31.70%39.56%-7.17%46.75%
CSU.TO
Constellation Software Inc.
-13.14%-22.07%24.91%59.50%-15.08%42.35%34.75%53.68%6.27%34.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TXN and CSU.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2006

0.22

The correlation between TXN and CSU.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TXN:

$275.22B

CSU.TO:

CA$61.96B

EPS

TXN:

$5.88

CSU.TO:

$34.85

PE Ratio

TXN:

51.24

CSU.TO:

60.01

PS Ratio

TXN:

14.91

CSU.TO:

3.65

PB Ratio

TXN:

16.40

CSU.TO:

11.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

TXN:

$18.44B

CSU.TO:

$12.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TXN:

$10.57B

CSU.TO:

$5.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

TXN:

$8.21B

CSU.TO:

$3.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXN vs. CSU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXN
TXN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXN Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

CSU.TO
CSU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CSU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CSU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXN vs. CSU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TXNCSU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.83

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

-0.76

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.90

-1.14

+5.04

TXN vs. CSU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the CSU.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXN and CSU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TXN vs. CSU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXN drawdown since its inception was -85.81%, which is greater than CSU.TO's maximum drawdown of -55.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXN and CSU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXNCSU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.81%

-55.74%

-30.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.57%

-55.24%

+25.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.41%

-55.74%

+22.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.41%

-55.74%

+22.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

-55.74%

+22.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.32%

-44.04%

+36.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-7.66%

-27.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.17%

36.71%

-22.54%

Volatility

TXN vs. CSU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) have volatilities of 14.23% and 14.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXNCSU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.23%

14.18%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.44%

34.30%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.13%

41.57%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.42%

29.09%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.17%

28.07%

+3.10%

Dividends

TXN vs. CSU.TO - Dividend Comparison

TXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than CSU.TO's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSU.TO
Constellation Software Inc.
0.19%0.17%0.12%0.16%0.24%0.17%0.32%1.85%0.50%0.57%0.71%0.81%
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
1.87%3.17%2.81%2.94%2.84%2.23%2.27%2.50%2.78%2.03%2.25%2.55%

Financials

TXN vs. CSU.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Instruments Incorporated and Constellation Software Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.83B
3.13B
(TXN) Total Revenue
(CSU.TO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TXN vs. CSU.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Texas Instruments Incorporated and Constellation Software Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
58.0%
23.4%
Portfolio components
TXN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 4.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.

CSU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a gross profit of 731.81M and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.

TXN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.81B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.

CSU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported an operating income of 451.48M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

TXN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in a net margin of 32.0%.

CSU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a net income of 360.99M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TXN and CSU.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXN and CSU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer