TXF.TO vs. CYBR.TO
TXF.TO (CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common) and CYBR.TO (Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units) are both exchange-traded funds - TXF.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by CI, while CYBR.TO is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Solactive Global Cyber Security Index Canadian Dollar Hedged. TXF.TO is actively managed, while CYBR.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TXF.TO returned 13.49%/yr vs 6.98%/yr for CYBR.TO. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TXF.TO charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CYBR.TO.
Performance
TXF.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TXF.TO achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly lower than CYBR.TO's 31.37% return.
TXF.TO
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- YTD
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- 17.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.65%
CYBR.TO
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- 6M
- 31.42%
- YTD
- 31.37%
- 1Y
- 23.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$239.84K | CA$197.23K | CA$250.21K | |
| CA$1.03M | CA$1.20M | CA$865.03K |
TXF.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common | 14.26% | 24.80% | 18.69% | 60.80% | -35.54% | 26.82% | 32.50% | 26.56% | -6.78% | 8.34% |
CYBR.TO Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units | 31.37% | 2.14% | 13.45% | 44.51% | -37.17% | 5.65% | 66.41% | 24.43% | 7.17% | 5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between TXF.TO and CYBR.TO is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between TXF.TO and CYBR.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
TXF.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TXF.TO
CYBR.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TXF.TO
CYBR.TO
Communication Services
TXF.TO
CYBR.TO
Financial Services
TXF.TO
CYBR.TO
-
Basic Materials
TXF.TO
-
CYBR.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
TXF.TO
-
CYBR.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
TXF.TO
-
CYBR.TO
-
Energy
TXF.TO
-
CYBR.TO
-
Healthcare
TXF.TO
-
CYBR.TO
-
Industrials
TXF.TO
-
CYBR.TO
Real Estate
TXF.TO
-
CYBR.TO
Utilities
TXF.TO
-
CYBR.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TXF.TO vs. CYBR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TXF.TO
CYBR.TO
TXF.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) and Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TXF.TO | CYBR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.14 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 0.76 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 1.59 | +4.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TXF.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.23%, smaller than the maximum CYBR.TO drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXF.TO and CYBR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TXF.TO | CYBR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.23% | -44.40% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.27% | -28.10% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.38% | -28.10% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.23% | -44.40% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.27% | -7.21% | -6.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -12.68% | +6.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.36% | 13.35% | -7.99% |
Volatility
TXF.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) at 8.61%. This indicates that TXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CYBR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TXF.TO | CYBR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | 8.61% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.79% | 25.60% | -2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.98% | 29.98% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 27.91% | -2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.05% | 26.64% | -2.59% |
TXF.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TXF.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than CYBR.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TXF.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Dividend Comparison
TXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.84%, more than CYBR.TO's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYBR.TO Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 0.22% | 0.13% | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common | 11.84% | 10.59% | 9.75% | 7.48% | 14.13% | 7.77% | 11.01% | 7.29% | 9.29% | 4.89% | 6.16% | 6.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TXF.TO and CYBR.TO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CYBR.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CYBR.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for TXF.TO.
TXF.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while CYBR.TO is Cybersecurity. They also come from different issuers: CI and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for TXF.TO and 0.60% for CYBR.TO.
Find the right allocation for TXF.TO and CYBR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer