PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWUSX vs. PRGMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWUSX vs. PRGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Short-Term Government Fund (TWUSX) and T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWUSX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than PRGMX's 0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TWUSX has outperformed PRGMX with an annualized return of 1.51%, while PRGMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.28% annualized return.


TWUSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.66%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
3.83%
5Y*
1.48%
10Y*
1.51%

PRGMX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.69%
6M
1.32%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
1.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWUSX vs. PRGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWUSX
American Century Short-Term Government Fund
0.36%4.94%3.59%3.70%-4.31%-0.09%3.36%2.91%1.12%0.22%
PRGMX
T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund
0.69%8.72%1.86%5.62%-11.45%-2.18%4.21%5.18%0.58%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TWUSX and PRGMX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1986

0.66

The correlation between TWUSX and PRGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWUSX vs. PRGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWUSX
TWUSX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TWUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TWUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGMX
PRGMX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PRGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWUSX vs. PRGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Short-Term Government Fund (TWUSX) and T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWUSXPRGMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.34

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

2.56

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

8.54

+3.27

TWUSX vs. PRGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the PRGMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWUSX and PRGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWUSXPRGMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.82

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.10

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.27

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.93

-0.93

Drawdowns

TWUSX vs. PRGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWUSX drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, which is greater than PRGMX's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWUSX and PRGMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWUSXPRGMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.06%

-18.22%

-72.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.98%

-3.00%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.09%

-7.14%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.81%

-17.30%

+11.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.85%

-18.22%

+12.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.62%

-1.49%

-63.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.97%

-2.24%

-74.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.89%

-0.61%

Volatility

TWUSX vs. PRGMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Short-Term Government Fund (TWUSX) is 0.51%, while T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that TWUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWUSXPRGMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

1.66%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.23%

3.10%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81%

4.20%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.31%

6.38%

-4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.82%

4.77%

-2.95%

TWUSX vs. PRGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWUSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGMX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWUSX vs. PRGMX - Dividend Comparison

TWUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than PRGMX's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGMX
T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund
5.00%4.96%4.47%3.54%1.38%0.59%1.44%2.39%2.78%2.98%2.88%3.12%
TWUSX
American Century Short-Term Government Fund
3.60%3.70%4.06%3.83%1.12%1.05%0.72%1.81%1.74%1.06%0.57%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWUSX and PRGMX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGMX has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to TWUSX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWUSX dropped -91.06% vs PRGMX's -18.22%.

TWUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWUSX and PRGMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer