TWUSX vs. ACFOX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Short-Term Government Fund (TWUSX) and American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX).
TWUSX is managed by American Century. It was launched on Dec 14, 1982. ACFOX is managed by American Century. It was launched on May 31, 2006.
Performance
TWUSX vs. ACFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TWUSX vs. ACFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWUSX American Century Short-Term Government Fund | -0.08% | 4.94% | 3.59% | 3.70% | -4.31% | -0.09% | 3.36% | 2.91% | 1.12% | 0.22% |
ACFOX American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund | -14.41% | 20.51% | 43.30% | 35.66% | -36.32% | 7.08% | 73.31% | 32.30% | 6.51% | 34.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWUSX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than ACFOX's -14.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TWUSX has underperformed ACFOX with an annualized return of 1.47%, while ACFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.85% annualized return.
TWUSX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.47%
ACFOX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- YTD
- -14.41%
- 6M
- -10.23%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.51%
- 10Y*
- 16.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TWUSX vs. ACFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWUSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ACFOX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TWUSX vs. ACFOX — Risk / Return Rank
TWUSX
ACFOX
TWUSX vs. ACFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Short-Term Government Fund (TWUSX) and American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TWUSX | ACFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 0.77 | +1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.36 | 1.26 | +2.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.17 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 0.94 | +2.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.86 | 3.40 | +9.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TWUSX | ACFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 0.77 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.26 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.71 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.52 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between TWUSX and ACFOX is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TWUSX vs. ACFOX - Dividend Comparison
TWUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than ACFOX's 8.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWUSX American Century Short-Term Government Fund | 3.34% | 3.70% | 4.06% | 3.83% | 1.12% | 1.05% | 0.72% | 1.81% | 1.74% | 1.06% | 0.57% | 0.53% |
ACFOX American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund | 8.83% | 7.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.48% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.15% | 1.33% |
Drawdowns
TWUSX vs. ACFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWUSX drawdown since its inception was -91.08%, which is greater than ACFOX's maximum drawdown of -58.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWUSX and ACFOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWUSX | ACFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.08% | -58.92% | -32.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.98% | -16.52% | +15.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.85% | -43.77% | +37.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.85% | -43.77% | +37.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.74% | -16.52% | -58.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.79% | -14.81% | -66.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 4.56% | -4.26% |
Volatility
TWUSX vs. ACFOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Short-Term Government Fund (TWUSX) is 0.51%, while American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that TWUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TWUSX | ACFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 6.86% | -6.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.12% | 14.48% | -13.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94% | 24.83% | -22.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.28% | 25.20% | -22.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.80% | 23.67% | -21.87% |