PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGMX vs. FVIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRGMX vs. FVIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) and Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class I (FVIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGMX achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly higher than FVIIX's -0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGMX has outperformed FVIIX with an annualized return of 1.15%, while FVIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.51% annualized return.


PRGMX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.10%
6M
-0.54%
YTD
0.01%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
1.15%
ALL TIME*
3.85%

FVIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.09%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.60%
1Y
1.51%
3Y*
2.80%
5Y*
-1.13%
10Y*
0.51%
ALL TIME*
2.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRGMX vs. FVIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGMX
T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund
0.01%8.72%1.86%5.62%-11.45%-2.18%4.21%5.18%0.58%1.23%
FVIIX
Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class I
-0.60%6.52%0.07%3.80%-13.09%-2.26%6.85%6.27%0.67%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGMX and FVIIX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2005

0.81

The correlation between PRGMX and FVIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGMX vs. FVIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRGMX
PRGMX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PRGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FVIIX
FVIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FVIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FVIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRGMX vs. FVIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) and Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class I (FVIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRGMXFVIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.13

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

0.92

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

2.22

+2.73

PRGMX vs. FVIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the FVIIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGMX and FVIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRGMX vs. FVIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGMX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, smaller than the maximum FVIIX drawdown of -20.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGMX and FVIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGMXFVIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.22%

-20.08%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-2.95%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.22%

-5.29%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.28%

-18.13%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.22%

-20.08%

+1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-8.03%

+5.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-3.78%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.21%

-0.14%

Volatility

PRGMX vs. FVIIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class I (FVIIX) at 0.84%. This indicates that PRGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRGMXFVIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

0.84%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.37%

2.74%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

3.59%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.43%

6.07%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.79%

5.02%

-0.23%

PRGMX vs. FVIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRGMX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FVIIX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRGMX vs. FVIIX - Dividend Comparison

PRGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than FVIIX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVIIX
Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class I
3.21%3.33%3.18%2.29%1.09%0.58%2.35%2.07%2.02%1.75%2.64%2.21%
PRGMX
T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund
4.43%4.96%4.47%3.54%1.38%0.59%1.44%2.39%2.78%2.98%2.88%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRGMX and FVIIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGMX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to FVIIX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGMX dropped -18.22% vs FVIIX's -20.08%.

PRGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGMX and FVIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer