PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWOX vs. CPST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWOX vs. CPST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWOX achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than CPST's 2.67% return.


TWOX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.50%
YTD
2.15%
6M
3.54%
1Y
16.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPST

1D
0.00%
1M
0.87%
YTD
2.67%
6M
2.98%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWOX vs. CPST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TWOX and CPST is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025

0.83

The correlation between TWOX and CPST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWOX vs. CPST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWOX
TWOX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TWOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TWOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CPST
CPST Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWOX vs. CPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWOXCPSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.82

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

5.38

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

28.97

-20.94

TWOX vs. CPST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the CPST Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWOX and CPST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWOXCPSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

3.56

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

2.02

-1.35

Drawdowns

TWOX vs. CPST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWOX drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than CPST's maximum drawdown of -3.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWOX and CPST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWOXCPSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-3.79%

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-1.42%

-8.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-0.35%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.26%

+1.75%

Volatility

TWOX vs. CPST - Volatility Comparison

iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPST) at 0.30%. This indicates that TWOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWOXCPSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

0.30%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

1.60%

+6.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.44%

2.15%

+8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

3.37%

+13.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

3.37%

+13.41%

TWOX vs. CPST - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWOX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CPST's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWOX vs. CPST - Dividend Comparison

TWOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while CPST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TWOX and CPST have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWOX has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to CPST (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWOX dropped -19.35% vs CPST's -3.79%.

On 1-year performance, TWOX leads with 16.12% vs 7.61% for CPST. On fees, TWOX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TWOX has performed better with a 16.12% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TWOX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPST.

TWOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for CPST.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TWOX and 0.69% for CPST.

CPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWOX and CPST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer