PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWOX vs. XBJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWOX vs. XBJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWOX achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than XBJL's 4.39% return.


TWOX

1D
0.03%
1M
0.65%
YTD
2.50%
6M
2.34%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XBJL

1D
0.05%
1M
0.54%
YTD
4.39%
6M
4.54%
1Y
11.62%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWOX vs. XBJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TWOX and XBJL is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025

0.92

The correlation between TWOX and XBJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWOX vs. XBJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWOX
TWOX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TWOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TWOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

XBJL
XBJL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XBJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBJL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XBJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBJL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWOX vs. XBJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWOXXBJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.52

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

3.53

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

19.91

-12.17

TWOX vs. XBJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the XBJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWOX and XBJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWOX vs. XBJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWOX drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than XBJL's maximum drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWOX and XBJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWOXXBJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-11.78%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-3.30%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-1.62%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.58%

+1.43%

Volatility

TWOX vs. XBJL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) at 0.30%. This indicates that TWOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWOXXBJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.30%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

3.67%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.42%

5.05%

+5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

9.94%

+6.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

9.94%

+6.55%

TWOX vs. XBJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWOX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XBJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWOX vs. XBJL - Dividend Comparison

TWOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while XBJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TWOX and XBJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TWOX has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to XBJL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWOX dropped -19.35% vs XBJL's -11.78%.

On 1-year performance, TWOX leads with 15.52% vs 11.62% for XBJL. On fees, TWOX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XBJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TWOX has performed better with a 15.52% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TWOX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBJL.

TWOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for XBJL.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TWOX and 0.79% for XBJL.

XBJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWOX and XBJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer