PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWN vs. DFRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWN vs. DFRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Taiwan Fund Inc. (TWN) and DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWN achieves a 78.55% return, which is significantly higher than DFRSX's 3.91% return. Over the past 10 years, TWN has outperformed DFRSX with an annualized return of 29.35%, while DFRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.94% annualized return.


TWN

1D
-5.65%
1M
1.47%
YTD
78.55%
6M
81.17%
1Y
150.01%
3Y*
59.72%
5Y*
32.06%
10Y*
29.35%

DFRSX

1D
0.04%
1M
1.23%
YTD
3.91%
6M
2.29%
1Y
28.91%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
6.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWN vs. DFRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWN
The Taiwan Fund Inc.
78.55%54.11%32.76%51.73%-38.54%58.14%40.71%47.00%-19.15%33.80%
DFRSX
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company
3.91%34.73%0.27%3.99%-16.96%12.59%14.24%13.30%-15.48%25.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TWN and DFRSX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996

0.46

The correlation between TWN and DFRSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWN vs. DFRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWN
TWN Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWN Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

DFRSX
DFRSX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DFRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DFRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWN vs. DFRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Taiwan Fund Inc. (TWN) and DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWNDFRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.34

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.25

2.09

+14.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

49.22

6.06

+43.16

TWN vs. DFRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWN Sharpe Ratio is 5.30, which is higher than the DFRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWN and DFRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWN vs. DFRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWN drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, which is greater than DFRSX's maximum drawdown of -69.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWN and DFRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWNDFRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.52%

-69.06%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-14.20%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.97%

-21.29%

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.72%

-30.18%

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.72%

-46.25%

-5.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-6.54%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.36%

-17.20%

-20.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

4.88%

-1.82%

Volatility

TWN vs. DFRSX - Volatility Comparison

The Taiwan Fund Inc. (TWN) has a higher volatility of 14.11% compared to DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) at 5.18%. This indicates that TWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWNDFRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.11%

5.18%

+8.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.07%

13.33%

+11.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.51%

16.09%

+12.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.33%

17.36%

+6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.75%

17.07%

+5.68%

Dividends

TWN vs. DFRSX - Dividend Comparison

TWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than DFRSX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFRSX
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company
4.73%4.92%4.66%4.70%9.99%12.82%2.91%4.56%3.48%4.01%3.79%3.96%
TWN
The Taiwan Fund Inc.
6.51%11.62%19.14%1.26%0.00%7.78%12.91%8.26%11.27%3.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWN and DFRSX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWN has higher volatility (14.11%) compared to DFRSX (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWN dropped -79.52% vs DFRSX's -69.06%.

TWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.30 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWN and DFRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer