PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWM vs. USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWM vs. USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWM achieves a -29.92% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 103.32% return. Over the past 10 years, TWM has underperformed USD with an annualized return of -27.72%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 61.24% annualized return.


TWM

1D
-3.04%
1M
-6.45%
YTD
-29.92%
6M
-26.93%
1Y
-50.45%
3Y*
-30.55%
5Y*
-17.63%
10Y*
-27.72%

USD

1D
-4.99%
1M
31.62%
YTD
103.32%
6M
97.79%
1Y
250.81%
3Y*
125.78%
5Y*
67.80%
10Y*
61.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWM vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWM
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000
-29.92%-24.71%-19.35%-26.84%28.43%-35.43%-60.01%-38.40%19.15%-26.36%
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
103.32%62.08%139.64%228.79%-68.57%104.27%68.16%110.37%-26.88%81.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TWM and USD is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

-0.67

The correlation between TWM and USD shifts across timeframes, from -0.67 (all time) to -0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TWM vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TWM
USD

Financial Services

76.5%
27.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

27.4%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

TWM
76.5%
USD
27.8%

Basic Materials

TWM

-

USD

-

Communication Services

TWM

-

USD

-

Consumer Cyclical

TWM

-

USD

-

Consumer Defensive

TWM

-

USD

-

Energy

TWM

-

USD
0.0%

Healthcare

TWM

-

USD

-

Industrials

TWM

-

USD

-

Real Estate

TWM

-

USD

-

Technology

TWM

-

USD
27.4%

Utilities

TWM

-

USD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWM vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWM
TWM Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
TWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWM Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
TWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWM Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

USD
USD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
USD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
USD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWM vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWMUSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.48

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

7.94

-8.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.63

22.96

-24.59

TWM vs. USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWM Sharpe Ratio is -1.32, which is lower than the USD Sharpe Ratio of 4.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWM and USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWMUSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.32

4.12

-5.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

0.89

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.61

0.89

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.57

0.49

-1.06

Drawdowns

TWM vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWM drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than USD's maximum drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWM and USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWMUSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-88.63%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.47%

-31.80%

-18.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.74%

-64.46%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.23%

-77.85%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.62%

-77.85%

-18.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

-6.07%

-93.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.28%

-32.35%

-54.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.03%

10.98%

+20.05%

Volatility

TWM vs. USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) is 11.50%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 21.29%. This indicates that TWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWMUSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.50%

21.29%

-9.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.38%

46.74%

-19.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.30%

61.28%

-22.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.11%

76.56%

-31.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.78%

69.24%

-23.46%

TWM vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TWM and USD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

TWM vs. USD - Dividend Comparison

TWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, more than USD's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TWM
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000
6.46%5.36%6.21%4.72%0.17%0.00%0.41%1.49%0.73%0.05%0.00%0.00%
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
0.23%0.39%0.10%0.05%0.30%0.00%0.14%0.72%0.93%0.32%0.46%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWM and USD have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USD has higher volatility (21.29%) compared to TWM (11.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWM dropped -99.93% vs USD's -88.63%.

On 10-year performance, USD leads with 61.24% vs -27.72% for TWM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TWM has been the lower-risk option at 11.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 61.24% return vs -27.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TWM and USD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

TWM has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 0.23% for USD.

TWM tracks Russell 2000 (-200%), while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%).

USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.12 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWM and USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer