PortfoliosLab logo
TWM vs. RWM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TWM and RWM is -0.86. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

TWM vs. RWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TWM:

-0.16

RWM:

0.06

Sortino Ratio

TWM:

0.26

RWM:

0.41

Omega Ratio

TWM:

1.03

RWM:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

TWM:

-0.03

RWM:

0.04

Martin Ratio

TWM:

-0.15

RWM:

0.45

Ulcer Index

TWM:

20.11%

RWM:

9.20%

Daily Std Dev

TWM:

49.05%

RWM:

24.54%

Max Drawdown

TWM:

-99.90%

RWM:

-94.64%

Current Drawdown

TWM:

-99.86%

RWM:

-93.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWM achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly higher than RWM's 8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TWM has underperformed RWM with an annualized return of -22.65%, while RWM has yielded a comparatively higher -8.91% annualized return.


TWM

YTD

12.91%

1M

-8.09%

6M

31.11%

1Y

-5.86%

3Y*

-16.52%

5Y*

-26.12%

10Y*

-22.65%

RWM

YTD

8.69%

1M

-3.85%

6M

17.72%

1Y

2.62%

3Y*

-3.88%

5Y*

-10.43%

10Y*

-8.91%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ProShares UltraShort Russell2000

ProShares Short Russell2000

TWM vs. RWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TWM and RWM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TWM vs. RWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TWM is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TWM is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TWM is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TWM is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TWM is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TWM is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

RWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RWM is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RWM is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RWM is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RWM is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RWM is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RWM is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TWM vs. RWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TWM Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the RWM Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWM and RWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TWM vs. RWM - Dividend Comparison

TWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than RWM's 4.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
TWM
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000
5.52%6.21%4.72%0.17%0.00%0.42%1.48%0.73%0.05%
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000
4.98%6.02%4.78%0.39%0.00%0.20%1.55%0.87%0.07%

Drawdowns

TWM vs. RWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWM drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than RWM's maximum drawdown of -94.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWM and RWM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TWM vs. RWM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) at 5.91%. This indicates that TWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...