TWM vs. TQQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TWM (ProShares UltraShort Russell2000) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - TWM tracks the Russell 2000 (-200%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TWM returned -27.65%/yr vs 45.33%/yr for TQQQ. At a correlation of -0.74, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

TWM vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWM achieves a -27.73% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, TWM has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -27.65%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.

TWM

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: -6.80%
• YTD: -27.73%
• 6M: -25.95%
• 1Y: -48.58%
• 3Y*: -29.21%
• 5Y*: -17.11%
• 10Y*: -27.65%

TQQQ

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 33.35%
• YTD: 64.46%
• 6M: 55.93%
• 1Y: 137.89%
• 3Y*: 69.49%
• 5Y*: 28.37%
• 10Y*: 45.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWM vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000	-27.73%	-24.71%	-19.35%	-26.84%	28.43%	-35.43%	-60.01%	-38.40%	19.15%	-26.36%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	64.46%	34.35%	58.27%	198.04%	-79.09%	82.98%	110.05%	133.84%	-19.79%	118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between TWM and TQQQ is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010	-0.74

The correlation between TWM and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

TWM vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TWM	TQQQ
Financial Services	76.5%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	53.8%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

TWM vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWM

TWM Risk / Return Rank: 1
TWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
TWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
TWM Omega Ratio Rank: 1
TWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TWM Martin Ratio Rank: 1

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 71
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWM vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TWM	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.28	2.92	-4.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.03	3.09	-5.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.40	-0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	3.75	-4.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.58	12.27	-13.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TWM vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWM Sharpe Ratio is -1.28, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWM and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TWM	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.28	2.92	-4.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.38	0.43	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.61	0.69	-1.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.57	0.74	-1.31

Drawdowns

TWM vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWM drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWM and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TWM	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.93%	-81.66%	-18.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.49%	-36.97%	-13.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-72.74%	-58.04%	-14.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.23%	-81.66%	+6.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.62%	-81.66%	-14.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.93%	-0.76%	-99.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-87.28%	-18.52%	-68.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.86%	11.28%	+19.58%

Volatility

TWM vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) is 11.60%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that TWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TWM	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.60%	13.29%	-1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.25%	36.04%	-8.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.32%	47.60%	-9.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.09%	66.53%	-21.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.78%	65.96%	-20.18%

TWM vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TWM and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

TWM vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

TWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.36%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000	6.27%	5.36%	6.21%	4.72%	0.17%	0.00%	0.41%	1.49%	0.73%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TWM and TQQQ in my portfolio?

TWM and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TWM or TQQQ?

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to TWM (11.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWM dropped -99.93% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

Which ETF is better, TWM or TQQQ?

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs -27.65% for TWM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TWM has been the lower-risk option at 11.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TWM or TQQQ?

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs -27.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TWM or TQQQ?

TWM and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TWM or TQQQ?

TWM has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

What is the main difference between TWM and TQQQ?

TWM tracks Russell 2000 (-200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.