TWEBX vs. GLIFX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TWEBX (Tweedy, Browne Value Fund) and GLIFX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares) are both mutual funds - TWEBX is a Global Equities fund managed by Tweedy, Browne, while GLIFX is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, TWEBX returned 8.73%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for GLIFX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TWEBX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GLIFX.

Performance

TWEBX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tweedy, Browne Value Fund (TWEBX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWEBX achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than GLIFX's 7.62% return. Over the past 10 years, TWEBX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 8.73%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.95% annualized return.

TWEBX

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 2.11%
• 6M: 8.29%
• YTD: 15.33%
• 1Y: 27.57%
• 3Y*: 13.98%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: 8.73%
• ALL TIME*: 8.02%

GLIFX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -1.19%
• 6M: 3.58%
• YTD: 7.62%
• 1Y: 13.37%
• 3Y*: 14.56%
• 5Y*: 10.84%
• 10Y*: 9.95%
• ALL TIME*: 10.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TWEBX Tweedy, Browne Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TWEBX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TWEBX Tweedy, Browne Value Fund	15.33%	21.59%	1.30%	15.21%	-5.65%	16.20%	-2.00%	16.09%	-6.43%	15.54%
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares	7.62%	23.85%	6.71%	10.89%	-1.33%	19.91%	-4.51%	22.27%	-3.82%	20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TWEBX and GLIFX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between TWEBX and GLIFX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TWEBX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TWEBX

TWEBX Risk / Return Rank: 90
TWEBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
TWEBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
TWEBX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
TWEBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
TWEBX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

GLIFX

GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 36
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TWEBX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tweedy, Browne Value Fund (TWEBX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TWEBX	GLIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	1.33	+1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.14	1.84	+2.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.24	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	1.61	+1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.05	4.34	+6.70

TWEBX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWEBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWEBX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TWEBX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWEBX drawdown since its inception was -45.77%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWEBX and GLIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TWEBX	GLIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.77%	-29.65%	-16.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	-9.00%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.49%	-9.00%	-3.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.03%	-17.15%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.88%	-29.65%	-3.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.53%	+5.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.66%	-3.38%	-2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	3.33%	-0.77%

Volatility

TWEBX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

Tweedy, Browne Value Fund (TWEBX) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) at 2.38%. This indicates that TWEBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TWEBX	GLIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.72%	2.38%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.17%	9.47%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.86%	10.89%	-1.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.09%	11.01%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.77%	13.18%	+0.59%

TWEBX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWEBX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

TWEBX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

TWEBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than GLIFX's 7.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares	7.29%	6.22%	4.26%	2.95%	14.81%	6.21%	2.59%	4.44%	14.29%	6.94%	1.91%	11.33%
TWEBX Tweedy, Browne Value Fund	3.32%	3.83%	11.81%	7.47%	6.52%	12.18%	2.02%	5.49%	24.34%	0.78%	4.42%	4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TWEBX and GLIFX in my portfolio?

TWEBX and GLIFX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TWEBX or GLIFX?

TWEBX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to GLIFX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWEBX dropped -45.77% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TWEBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.