PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWCUX vs. ACGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWCUX achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than ACGR's 1.49% return.


TWCUX

1D
-2.03%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
1.69%
6M
0.14%
1Y
14.38%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
17.84%

ACGR

1D
-0.64%
1M
-4.80%
YTD
1.49%
6M
0.31%
1Y
14.98%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TWCUX
American Century Ultra Fund
1.69%12.66%29.54%43.36%-32.38%23.47%42.24%
ACGR
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF
1.49%14.50%26.66%43.24%-30.13%39.24%11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TWCUX and ACGR is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.83

The correlation between TWCUX and ACGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.98 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWCUX vs. ACGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWCUX
TWCUX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TWCUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWCUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWCUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TWCUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWCUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ACGR
ACGR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ACGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACGR Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ACGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACGR Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWCUXACGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

0.95

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.46

3.12

+0.34

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWCUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the ACGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWCUX and ACGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWCUX drawdown since its inception was -62.11%, which is greater than ACGR's maximum drawdown of -34.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWCUX and ACGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWCUXACGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.11%

-34.54%

-27.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.72%

-15.84%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.86%

-24.58%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-34.54%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.64%

-7.08%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.79%

-8.46%

-8.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

4.81%

-0.17%

Volatility

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Volatility Comparison

American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) at 5.95%. This indicates that TWCUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWCUXACGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

5.95%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

12.74%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.37%

16.18%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.71%

21.64%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

21.43%

+0.70%

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWCUX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than ACGR's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Dividend Comparison

TWCUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.38%, more than ACGR's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACGR
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF
0.12%0.11%0.23%0.37%0.48%0.58%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TWCUX
American Century Ultra Fund
11.38%11.57%3.58%6.09%7.42%6.78%2.80%4.27%8.24%5.85%4.58%5.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TWCUX and ACGR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TWCUX has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to ACGR (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWCUX dropped -62.11% vs ACGR's -34.54%.

ACGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWCUX and ACGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer