TWCUX vs. ACGR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TWCUX (American Century Ultra Fund) and ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from American Century. Over the past 5 years, TWCUX returned 13.04%/yr vs 15.06%/yr for ACGR. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TWCUX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ACGR.

Performance

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWCUX achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than ACGR's 7.39% return.

TWCUX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 6.24%
• YTD: 9.68%
• 6M: 8.02%
• 1Y: 25.64%
• 3Y*: 21.95%
• 5Y*: 13.04%
• 10Y*: 18.29%

ACGR

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 6.10%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 6.90%
• 1Y: 24.19%
• 3Y*: 21.44%
• 5Y*: 15.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TWCUX American Century Ultra Fund	9.68%	12.66%	29.54%	43.36%	-32.38%	23.47%	42.19%
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF	7.39%	14.50%	26.66%	43.24%	-30.13%	39.24%	11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TWCUX and ACGR is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020	0.83

The correlation between TWCUX and ACGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.97 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TWCUX vs. ACGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWCUX

TWCUX Risk / Return Rank: 27
TWCUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
TWCUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TWCUX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
TWCUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
TWCUX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

ACGR

ACGR Risk / Return Rank: 40
ACGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ACGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ACGR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
ACGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ACGR Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TWCUX	ACGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.57	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	2.17	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.27	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	1.53	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.89	5.20	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWCUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the ACGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWCUX and ACGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TWCUX	ACGR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.57	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.70	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.70	-0.16

Drawdowns

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWCUX drawdown since its inception was -62.11%, which is greater than ACGR's maximum drawdown of -34.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWCUX and ACGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TWCUX	ACGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.11%	-34.54%	-27.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.72%	-15.84%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.86%	-24.58%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.23%	-34.54%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-1.68%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.81%	-8.50%	-8.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.48%	4.66%	-0.18%

Volatility

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Volatility Comparison

American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) have volatilities of 3.78% and 3.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TWCUX	ACGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	3.65%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.33%	11.95%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.31%	15.49%	+0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.56%	21.51%	+1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.08%	21.42%	+0.66%

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWCUX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than ACGR's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

TWCUX vs. ACGR - Dividend Comparison

TWCUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.55%, more than ACGR's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF	0.09%	0.11%	0.23%	0.37%	0.48%	0.58%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TWCUX American Century Ultra Fund	10.55%	11.57%	3.58%	6.09%	7.42%	6.78%	2.80%	4.27%	8.24%	5.85%	4.58%	5.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TWCUX and ACGR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, TWCUX and ACGR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TWCUX or ACGR?

TWCUX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to ACGR (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWCUX dropped -62.11% vs ACGR's -34.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TWCUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.