TWCUX vs. PLFMX
TWCUX (American Century Ultra Fund) and PLFMX (Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - TWCUX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by American Century, while PLFMX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, TWCUX returned 18.08%/yr vs 15.12%/yr for PLFMX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TWCUX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for PLFMX.
Performance
TWCUX vs. PLFMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWCUX achieves a 3.79% return, which is significantly lower than PLFMX's 9.46% return. Over the past 10 years, TWCUX has outperformed PLFMX with an annualized return of 18.08%, while PLFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.12% annualized return.
TWCUX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 18.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 18.08%
PLFMX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 9.46%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.12%
TWCUX vs. PLFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWCUX American Century Ultra Fund | 3.79% | 12.66% | 29.54% | 43.36% | -32.38% | 23.47% | 49.79% | 34.60% | 0.70% | 31.65% |
PLFMX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund | 9.46% | 17.10% | 26.06% | 25.27% | -18.67% | 27.57% | 17.46% | 30.58% | -5.14% | 20.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TWCUX and PLFMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2000 | 0.93 |
The correlation between TWCUX and PLFMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWCUX vs. PLFMX — Risk / Return Rank
TWCUX
PLFMX
TWCUX vs. PLFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) and Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TWCUX | PLFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 2.89 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.28 | 13.00 | -8.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TWCUX vs. PLFMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWCUX drawdown since its inception was -62.11%, which is greater than PLFMX's maximum drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWCUX and PLFMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWCUX | PLFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.11% | -55.62% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.72% | -9.00% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.86% | -18.83% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.23% | -24.91% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.23% | -33.80% | -1.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -1.74% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.79% | -9.98% | -6.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 2.00% | +2.62% |
Volatility
TWCUX vs. PLFMX - Volatility Comparison
American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) at 4.68%. This indicates that TWCUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TWCUX | PLFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 4.68% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 9.85% | +3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.27% | 12.50% | +4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 17.01% | +5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.16% | 17.54% | +4.62% |
TWCUX vs. PLFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWCUX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than PLFMX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
TWCUX vs. PLFMX - Dividend Comparison
TWCUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.15%, more than PLFMX's 2.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLFMX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund | 2.20% | 2.41% | 3.77% | 3.62% | 2.28% | 13.02% | 7.02% | 3.28% | 6.80% | 6.44% | 2.66% | 2.07% |
TWCUX American Century Ultra Fund | 11.15% | 11.57% | 3.58% | 6.09% | 7.42% | 6.78% | 2.80% | 4.27% | 8.24% | 5.85% | 4.58% | 5.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, TWCUX and PLFMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TWCUX has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to PLFMX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWCUX dropped -62.11% vs PLFMX's -55.62%.
PLFMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TWCUX and PLFMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer