PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWCUX vs. ACFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWCUX vs. ACFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) and American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWCUX achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than ACFOX's 7.27% return. Over the past 10 years, TWCUX has underperformed ACFOX with an annualized return of 18.10%, while ACFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.35% annualized return.


TWCUX

1D
-1.62%
1M
3.99%
YTD
7.91%
6M
6.18%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
21.28%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
18.10%

ACFOX

1D
-1.84%
1M
4.32%
YTD
7.27%
6M
8.09%
1Y
30.11%
3Y*
27.50%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
19.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWCUX vs. ACFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWCUX
American Century Ultra Fund
7.91%12.66%29.54%43.36%-32.38%23.47%49.79%34.60%0.70%31.65%
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
7.27%20.51%43.30%35.66%-36.32%7.08%73.31%32.30%6.51%34.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TWCUX and ACFOX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2006

0.93

The correlation between TWCUX and ACFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWCUX vs. ACFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWCUX
TWCUX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TWCUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWCUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWCUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TWCUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWCUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ACFOX
ACFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ACFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ACFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWCUX vs. ACFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) and American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWCUXACFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.87

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.28

6.58

-1.30

TWCUX vs. ACFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWCUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the ACFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWCUX and ACFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWCUXACFOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.63

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.44

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.82

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.58

-0.05

Drawdowns

TWCUX vs. ACFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWCUX drawdown since its inception was -62.11%, which is greater than ACFOX's maximum drawdown of -58.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWCUX and ACFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWCUXACFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.11%

-58.92%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.72%

-16.52%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.86%

-27.03%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-43.77%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

-43.77%

+8.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-2.88%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.81%

-14.71%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

4.68%

-0.20%

Volatility

TWCUX vs. ACFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) is 4.24%, while American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that TWCUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWCUXACFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

5.59%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

14.68%

-2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

18.89%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

25.28%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.08%

23.81%

-1.73%

TWCUX vs. ACFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWCUX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than ACFOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWCUX vs. ACFOX - Dividend Comparison

TWCUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.73%, more than ACFOX's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
7.04%7.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.48%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.15%1.33%
TWCUX
American Century Ultra Fund
10.73%11.57%3.58%6.09%7.42%6.78%2.80%4.27%8.24%5.85%4.58%5.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TWCUX and ACFOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACFOX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to TWCUX (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWCUX dropped -62.11% vs ACFOX's -58.92%.

ACFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWCUX and ACFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer