PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWAAX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent International Allocation Fund (TWAAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWAAX achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 10.59% return.


TWAAX

1D
1.46%
1M
4.07%
YTD
16.07%
6M
16.49%
1Y
31.97%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
8.26%

FHLFX

1D
0.78%
1M
1.95%
YTD
10.59%
6M
11.10%
1Y
25.40%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TWAAX
Thrivent International Allocation Fund
16.07%30.28%3.86%17.51%-18.59%13.88%3.38%19.95%-12.67%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
10.59%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between TWAAX and FHLFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.97

The correlation between TWAAX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWAAX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWAAX
TWAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TWAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TWAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent International Allocation Fund (TWAAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWAAXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.15

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

8.04

+1.95

TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWAAX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWAAX drawdown since its inception was -54.24%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWAAX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWAAXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.24%

-33.58%

-20.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-11.37%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-13.62%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.71%

-29.36%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-6.08%

-6.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.03%

+0.09%

Volatility

TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent International Allocation Fund (TWAAX) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.91%. This indicates that TWAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWAAXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

4.91%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

12.74%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

15.27%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

16.06%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

17.65%

-1.54%

TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWAAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

TWAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than FHLFX's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.13%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%
TWAAX
Thrivent International Allocation Fund
5.67%6.59%2.66%2.72%1.72%9.19%1.25%2.15%5.56%2.08%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TWAAX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TWAAX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to FHLFX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWAAX dropped -54.24% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

TWAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWAAX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer