TWAAX vs. FHLFX
TWAAX (Thrivent International Allocation Fund) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TWAAX returned 8.20%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for FHLFX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TWAAX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.
Performance
TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TWAAX having a 12.89% return and FHLFX slightly lower at 12.57%.
TWAAX
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- 26.11%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.22%
FHLFX
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 26.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWAAX Thrivent International Allocation Fund | 12.89% | 30.28% | 3.86% | 17.51% | -18.59% | 13.88% | 3.38% | 19.95% | -12.67% |
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 12.57% | 31.96% | 3.67% | 18.16% | -14.17% | 11.23% | 8.09% | 21.66% | -10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TWAAX and FHLFX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018 | 0.97 |
The correlation between TWAAX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWAAX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank
TWAAX
FHLFX
TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent International Allocation Fund (TWAAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TWAAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.19 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 8.31 | -0.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWAAX drawdown since its inception was -54.24%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWAAX and FHLFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWAAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.24% | -33.58% | -20.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -11.37% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.95% | -13.62% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.71% | -29.36% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | 0.00% | -3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.60% | -6.01% | -6.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.00% | +0.30% |
Volatility
TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent International Allocation Fund (TWAAX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.58%. This indicates that TWAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TWAAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 4.58% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 13.23% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 15.54% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 16.11% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 17.62% | -1.61% |
TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWAAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
TWAAX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison
TWAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than FHLFX's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 3.07% | 3.46% | 2.98% | 2.86% | 2.60% | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.95% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TWAAX Thrivent International Allocation Fund | 5.83% | 6.59% | 2.66% | 2.72% | 1.72% | 9.19% | 1.25% | 2.15% | 5.56% | 2.08% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, TWAAX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TWAAX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to FHLFX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWAAX dropped -54.24% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.
FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TWAAX and FHLFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer