PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWAAX vs. FAERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWAAX vs. FAERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent International Allocation Fund (TWAAX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M (FAERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, TWAAX has outperformed FAERX with an annualized return of 8.26%, while FAERX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.06% annualized return.


TWAAX

1D
1.46%
1M
4.07%
YTD
16.07%
6M
16.49%
1Y
31.97%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
8.26%

FAERX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
0.04%
3Y*
7.45%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
7.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWAAX vs. FAERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWAAX
Thrivent International Allocation Fund
16.07%30.28%3.86%17.51%-18.59%13.88%3.38%19.95%-15.80%21.50%
FAERX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M
0.00%14.70%4.40%19.78%-24.77%18.63%14.43%27.14%-15.25%29.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TWAAX and FAERX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008

0.93

Over the past year, the correlation between TWAAX and FAERX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.93, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWAAX vs. FAERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWAAX
TWAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TWAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TWAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FAERX
FAERX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FAERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAERX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FAERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAERX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWAAX vs. FAERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent International Allocation Fund (TWAAX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M (FAERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWAAXFAERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.99

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

-0.10

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

-0.16

+10.15

TWAAX vs. FAERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the FAERX Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWAAX and FAERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWAAX vs. FAERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWAAX drawdown since its inception was -54.24%, smaller than the maximum FAERX drawdown of -60.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWAAX and FAERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWAAXFAERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.24%

-60.14%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-7.29%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-14.00%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.71%

-36.62%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

-36.62%

-2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.89%

+5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-14.36%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

4.16%

-1.04%

Volatility

TWAAX vs. FAERX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent International Allocation Fund (TWAAX) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M (FAERX) at 0.00%. This indicates that TWAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWAAXFAERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

0.00%

+6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

3.62%

+10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

8.78%

+7.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

16.72%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

16.64%

-0.53%

TWAAX vs. FAERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWAAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FAERX's 1.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWAAX vs. FAERX - Dividend Comparison

TWAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than FAERX's 7.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAERX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M
7.94%7.94%0.96%0.51%0.12%2.07%0.00%1.15%4.25%3.35%0.80%0.09%
TWAAX
Thrivent International Allocation Fund
5.67%6.59%2.66%2.72%1.72%9.19%1.25%2.15%5.56%2.08%2.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWAAX and FAERX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWAAX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to FAERX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWAAX dropped -54.24% vs FAERX's -60.14%.

TWAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWAAX and FAERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer