PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TVAL vs. ROE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TVAL vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Value ETF (TVAL) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TVAL achieves a 15.42% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 20.98% return.


TVAL

1D
-0.05%
1M
3.86%
YTD
15.42%
6M
16.79%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ROE

1D
-0.04%
1M
8.10%
YTD
20.98%
6M
21.56%
1Y
37.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TVAL vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TVAL
T. Rowe Price Value ETF
15.42%15.59%14.54%4.01%
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
20.98%17.20%18.34%4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TVAL and ROE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2023

0.87

The correlation between TVAL and ROE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

TVAL vs. ROE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TVAL
ROE

Financial Services

18.9%
11.7%

Technology

16.7%
36.1%

Industrials

12.2%
9.8%

Healthcare

11.4%
8.7%

Energy

8.5%
3.5%

Communication Services

7.7%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
4.7%

Utilities

4.8%
1.9%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.8%

Real Estate

3.0%
1.9%

Financial Services

TVAL
18.9%
ROE
11.7%

Technology

TVAL
16.7%
ROE
36.1%

Industrials

TVAL
12.2%
ROE
9.8%

Healthcare

TVAL
11.4%
ROE
8.7%

Energy

TVAL
8.5%
ROE
3.5%

Communication Services

TVAL
7.7%
ROE
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TVAL
7.1%
ROE
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

TVAL
6.1%
ROE
4.7%

Utilities

TVAL
4.8%
ROE
1.9%

Basic Materials

TVAL
3.6%
ROE
1.8%

Real Estate

TVAL
3.0%
ROE
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TVAL vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TVAL
TVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ROE
ROE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TVAL vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Value ETF (TVAL) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TVALROEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.48

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

4.41

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.80

19.92

-3.12

TVAL vs. ROE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the ROE Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TVAL and ROE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TVALROEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.74

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

1.39

+0.09

Drawdowns

TVAL vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TVAL drawdown since its inception was -14.84%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TVAL and ROE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TVALROEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.84%

-19.10%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-8.66%

+1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.04%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-2.59%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.91%

-0.21%

Volatility

TVAL vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Value ETF (TVAL) is 3.18%, while Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that TVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TVALROEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.79%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

10.66%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.65%

13.94%

-3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.59%

15.78%

-3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.59%

15.78%

-3.19%

TVAL vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TVAL has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

TVAL vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

TVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than ROE's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
0.94%0.97%1.18%0.68%
TVAL
T. Rowe Price Value ETF
1.00%1.15%1.16%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


TVAL and ROE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROE has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to TVAL (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TVAL dropped -14.84% vs ROE's -19.10%.

On 1-year performance, ROE leads with 37.99% vs 28.49% for TVAL. On fees, TVAL is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, TVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ROE has performed better with a 37.99% return vs 28.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TVAL is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.

TVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.94% for ROE.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for TVAL and 0.49% for ROE.

ROE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TVAL and ROE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer