PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TURF vs. METL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TURF vs. METL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TURF achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than METL's 18.34% return.


TURF

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.33%
YTD
19.55%
6M
22.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

METL

1D
-3.81%
1M
5.71%
YTD
18.34%
6M
25.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TURF vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TURF and METL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TURF vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TURF vs. METL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TURFMETLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.52

1.72

+0.80

Drawdowns

TURF vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TURF drawdown since its inception was -6.84%, smaller than the maximum METL drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TURF and METL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TURFMETLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-27.39%

+20.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-10.27%

+7.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-8.11%

+6.58%

Volatility

TURF vs. METL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TURFMETLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

43.94%

-27.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

43.94%

-27.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

43.94%

-27.44%

TURF vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TURF has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TURF vs. METL - Dividend Comparison

TURF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than METL's 0.84% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TURF and METL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TURF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TURF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.

TURF has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.84% for METL.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TURF and 0.89% for METL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TURF and METL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer