TUGN vs. TEPAX
TUGN (STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF) and TEPAX (American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio) are both funds - TUGN is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by STF, while TEPAX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 3 years, TUGN returned 22.62%/yr vs 3.42%/yr for TEPAX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUGN charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for TEPAX.
Performance
TUGN vs. TEPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUGN achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly higher than TEPAX's 0.81% return.
TUGN
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 36.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEPAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
TUGN vs. TEPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF | 18.98% | 19.11% | 18.44% | 34.84% | -18.78% |
TEPAX American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio | 0.81% | 4.36% | 2.14% | 3.63% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUGN and TEPAX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUGN vs. TEPAX — Risk / Return Rank
TUGN
TEPAX
TUGN vs. TEPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio (TEPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUGN | TEPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.85 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 2.33 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.73 | 7.18 | +2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUGN | TEPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 3.01 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.85 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
TUGN vs. TEPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than TEPAX's maximum drawdown of -7.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and TEPAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUGN | TEPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.45% | -7.13% | -16.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.96% | -1.82% | -11.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.60% | -2.23% | -19.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -7.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.80% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -1.24% | -5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 0.59% | +3.12% |
Volatility
TUGN vs. TEPAX - Volatility Comparison
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) has a higher volatility of 5.28% compared to American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio (TEPAX) at 0.57%. This indicates that TUGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUGN | TEPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | 0.57% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 1.14% | +10.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 1.41% | +13.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 1.95% | +15.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 2.07% | +14.96% |
TUGN vs. TEPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUGN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TEPAX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUGN vs. TEPAX - Dividend Comparison
TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than TEPAX's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEPAX American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio | 2.38% | 2.39% | 2.44% | 1.96% | 1.11% | 0.87% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.72% | 1.79% | 2.22% | 2.36% |
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF | 10.53% | 11.50% | 11.84% | 10.83% | 7.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUGN and TEPAX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUGN has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to TEPAX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUGN dropped -23.45% vs TEPAX's -7.13%.
TEPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUGN and TEPAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer