TUA vs. SSO
TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - TUA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. TUA is actively managed, while SSO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUA returned -0.18%/yr vs 33.83%/yr for SSO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
TUA vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUA achieves a -6.11% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 12.95% return.
TUA
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- -6.11%
- 6M
- -5.54%
- 1Y
- -3.80%
- 3Y*
- -0.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSO
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 42.28%
- 3Y*
- 33.83%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 24.26%
TUA vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -6.11% | 7.27% | -3.59% | -2.04% | -0.83% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 12.95% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -6.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUA and SSO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2022 | 0.03 |
The correlation between TUA and SSO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUA vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
TUA
SSO
TUA vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TUA | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.30 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 2.34 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 9.90 | -11.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TUA vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUA drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUA and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUA | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -84.67% | +68.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | -18.17% | +10.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.14% | -35.21% | +26.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.75% | -6.70% | -4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -19.53% | +11.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 4.28% | -1.35% |
Volatility
TUA vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) is 2.72%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 9.70%. This indicates that TUA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUA | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 9.70% | -6.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.28% | 19.65% | -14.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.03% | 24.92% | -17.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 33.85% | -23.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 35.93% | -25.18% |
TUA vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUA vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
TUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than SSO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.58% | 3.84% | 5.19% | 4.83% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUA and SSO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSO has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to TUA (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUA dropped -15.85% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 3-year performance, SSO leads with 33.83% vs -0.18% for TUA. On fees, TUA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, TUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SSO has performed better with a 33.83% return vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TUA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
TUA has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.65% for SSO.
TUA is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TUA and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUA and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer