TUA vs. MYCI
TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and MYCI (State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TUA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify, while MYCI is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TUA returned -2.21% vs 4.75% for MYCI. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TUA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MYCI.
Performance
TUA vs. MYCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUA achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly lower than MYCI's 0.45% return.
TUA
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -4.96%
- 6M
- -4.51%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- -0.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MYCI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUA vs. MYCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -4.96% | 7.27% | -7.56% |
MYCI State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.45% | 7.59% | -1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUA and MYCI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between TUA and MYCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUA vs. MYCI — Risk / Return Rank
TUA
MYCI
TUA vs. MYCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUA | MYCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.42 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 3.05 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 11.23 | -12.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUA | MYCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 2.15 | -2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 1.24 | -1.36 |
Drawdowns
TUA vs. MYCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUA drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, which is greater than MYCI's maximum drawdown of -2.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUA and MYCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUA | MYCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -2.41% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -1.56% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.65% | -0.56% | -9.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -0.54% | -7.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 0.42% | +2.14% |
Volatility
TUA vs. MYCI - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) at 0.59%. This indicates that TUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MYCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUA | MYCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 0.59% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.85% | 1.50% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.86% | 2.22% | +4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 3.02% | +7.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 3.02% | +7.74% |
TUA vs. MYCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than MYCI's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TUA vs. MYCI - Dividend Comparison
TUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than MYCI's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYCI State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.57% | 4.56% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.54% | 3.84% | 5.19% | 4.83% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUA and MYCI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUA has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to MYCI (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUA dropped -15.85% vs MYCI's -2.41%.
On 1-year performance, MYCI leads with 4.75% vs -2.21% for TUA. On fees, MYCI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCI has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MYCI has performed better with a 4.75% return vs -2.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MYCI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for TUA.
MYCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 3.54% for TUA.
TUA is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while MYCI is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TUA and 0.15% for MYCI.
MYCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUA and MYCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer