TTXU vs. NUGT
TTXU (Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF) and NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Information Technology Top 5 Equal Capped Index, while NUGT is a Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TTXU charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for NUGT.
Performance
TTXU vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTXU achieves a 50.13% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's -36.39% return.
TTXU
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 55.95%
- YTD
- 50.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUGT
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -12.82%
- 6M
- -45.09%
- YTD
- -36.39%
- 1Y
- 55.94%
- 3Y*
- 51.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.63%
- 10Y*
- -14.50%
TTXU vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTXU Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF | 50.13% | -14.75% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -36.39% | 19.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTXU and NUGT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTXU vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank
TTXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUGT
TTXU vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TTXU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTXU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTXU vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTXU drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTXU and NUGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTXU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.47% | -99.97% | +48.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -64.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -64.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.26% | -99.85% | +83.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.21% | -91.55% | +69.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.75% | — |
Volatility
TTXU vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTXU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 30.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 79.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.88% | 94.83% | -30.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.88% | 73.24% | -9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.88% | 87.76% | -23.88% |
TTXU vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTXU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTXU vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison
TTXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than NUGT's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 0.61% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% |
TTXU Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF | 0.50% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTXU and NUGT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TTXU is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TTXU is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.
NUGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.50% for TTXU.
TTXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUGT is Gold. TTXU tracks S&P 500 Information Technology Top 5 Equal Capped Index, while NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TTXU and 1.13% for NUGT.
Find the right allocation for TTXU and NUGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer