PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTWO vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTWO vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTWO achieves a -17.29% return, which is significantly lower than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, TTWO has outperformed T with an annualized return of 18.63%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.


TTWO

1D
-0.16%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
-17.29%
6M
-12.31%
1Y
-9.69%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
18.63%

T

1D
2.52%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTWO vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
-17.29%39.09%14.37%54.57%-41.41%-14.47%69.72%18.93%-6.23%122.72%
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TTWO and T is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 1997

0.15

The correlation between TTWO and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TTWO:

-$1.62

T:

$3.04

PS Ratio

TTWO:

5.84

T:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTWO:

$6.66B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTWO:

$3.81B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

TTWO:

$850.50M

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTWO vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTWO
TTWO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
TTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTWO vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTWOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.92

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

-0.59

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

-1.22

+0.46

TTWO vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTWO Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTWO and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTWO vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTWO drawdown since its inception was -80.85%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTWO and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTWOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.85%

-64.15%

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.68%

-21.87%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

-21.87%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.50%

-32.01%

-19.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.14%

-42.35%

-13.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.27%

-18.12%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.79%

-15.72%

-12.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.81%

10.64%

+2.17%

Volatility

TTWO vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) has a higher volatility of 10.33% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 8.21%. This indicates that TTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTWOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.33%

8.21%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.93%

17.80%

+6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.37%

22.13%

+7.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.30%

24.01%

+8.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.03%

23.73%

+10.30%

Dividends

TTWO vs. T - Dividend Comparison

TTWO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TTWO vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
1.68B
33.47B
(TTWO) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TTWO and T have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTWO has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTWO dropped -80.85% vs T's -64.15%.

TTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTWO and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer