PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTWO vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTWO vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTWO achieves a -5.12% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 20.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TTWO having a 19.72% annualized return and MAR not far behind at 19.19%.


TTWO

1D
-1.82%
1M
-4.73%
6M
10.27%
YTD
-5.12%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
19.72%
ALL TIME*
15.39%

MAR

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.03%
6M
18.71%
YTD
20.64%
1Y
47.30%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
21.60%
10Y*
19.19%
ALL TIME*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$498.48M$519.42M$558.67M
$418.48M$439.37M$590.49M

TTWO vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
-5.12%39.09%14.37%54.57%-41.41%-14.47%69.72%18.93%-6.23%122.72%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
20.64%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TTWO and MAR is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 1997

0.25

The correlation between TTWO and MAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TTWO:

$45.42B

MAR:

$98.31B

EPS

TTWO:

-$1.62

MAR:

$14.30

PS Ratio

TTWO:

6.73

MAR:

3.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTWO:

$6.66B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTWO:

$3.81B

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

TTWO:

$850.50M

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTWO vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TTWO
TTWO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TTWO vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTWOMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.28

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

3.38

-3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

9.06

-8.36

TTWO vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTWO Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTWO and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTWO vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTWO drawdown since its inception was -80.85%, which is greater than MAR's maximum drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTWO and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTWOMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.85%

-75.59%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.68%

-12.65%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

-30.50%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.50%

-30.50%

-21.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.14%

-61.26%

+5.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-7.38%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.70%

-14.86%

-12.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.00%

4.72%

+8.28%

Volatility

TTWO vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) has a higher volatility of 8.99% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 7.10%. This indicates that TTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTWOMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.99%

7.10%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.42%

19.70%

+6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.46%

26.66%

+4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.57%

28.68%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.13%

32.80%

+1.33%

Dividends

TTWO vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

TTWO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.73%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TTWO vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TTWO and MAR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTWO has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to MAR (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTWO dropped -80.85% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTWO and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer