TTWO vs. QBTS
TTWO (Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. TTWO operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services), while QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 3 years, TTWO returned 15.77%/yr vs 123.62%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TTWO vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTWO achieves a -17.29% return, which is significantly lower than QBTS's -10.63% return.
TTWO
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -12.65%
- YTD
- -17.29%
- 6M
- -12.31%
- 1Y
- -8.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 54.05%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTWO vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTWO Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | -17.29% | 39.09% | 14.37% | 54.57% | -18.11% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTWO and QBTS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
TTWO:
$39.24B
QBTS:
$8.59B
TTWO:
-$1.62
QBTS:
-$1.08
TTWO:
5.84
QBTS:
637.12
TTWO:
11.18
QBTS:
7.64
TTWO:
$6.66B
QBTS:
$12.44M
TTWO:
$3.81B
QBTS:
$8.25M
TTWO:
$850.50M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTWO vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
TTWO
QBTS
TTWO vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTWO | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.16 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 0.67 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 1.16 | -1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTWO vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTWO drawdown since its inception was -80.85%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTWO and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTWO | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.85% | -96.67% | +15.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.68% | -71.01% | +43.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | -79.17% | +51.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.27% | -47.81% | +28.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.79% | -65.66% | +37.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.81% | 40.64% | -27.83% |
Volatility
TTWO vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) is 10.33%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.66%. This indicates that TTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTWO | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.33% | 42.66% | -32.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.93% | 76.89% | -52.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.37% | 108.46% | -79.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.30% | 150.99% | -118.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.03% | 150.99% | -116.96% |
Dividends
TTWO vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTWO nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TTWO vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TTWO and QBTS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to TTWO (10.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTWO dropped -80.85% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTWO and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer