PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTT vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTT vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTT achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 30.62% return. Over the past 10 years, TTT has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of -1.30%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 30.36% annualized return.


TTT

1D
-0.75%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
2.52%
6M
8.18%
1Y
-7.12%
3Y*
9.61%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
-1.30%

UPRO

1D
0.39%
1M
15.79%
YTD
30.62%
6M
30.65%
1Y
87.98%
3Y*
53.66%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
30.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTT vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
2.52%-7.89%38.07%-11.25%150.17%2.55%-54.12%-34.88%6.34%-25.87%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
30.62%31.88%63.57%68.53%-56.84%98.64%10.09%102.30%-25.11%71.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TTT and UPRO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012

0.19

The correlation between TTT and UPRO shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TTT vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TTT
UPRO

Financial Services

62.5%
28.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Communication Services

-

4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Healthcare

-

3.8%

Industrials

-

3.4%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

-

17.8%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Financial Services

TTT
62.5%
UPRO
28.8%

Basic Materials

TTT

-

UPRO
0.8%

Communication Services

TTT

-

UPRO
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TTT

-

UPRO
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

TTT

-

UPRO
2.0%

Energy

TTT

-

UPRO
1.4%

Healthcare

TTT

-

UPRO
3.8%

Industrials

TTT

-

UPRO
3.4%

Real Estate

TTT

-

UPRO
0.8%

Technology

TTT

-

UPRO
17.8%

Utilities

TTT

-

UPRO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTT vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTT
TTT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTT vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTTUPRODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.24

2.51

-2.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.15

2.94

-3.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.39

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

3.40

-3.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.40

14.36

-14.76

TTT vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTT Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTT and UPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTTUPRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

2.51

-2.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.49

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.57

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.66

-0.89

Drawdowns

TTT vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTT drawdown since its inception was -94.00%, which is greater than UPRO's maximum drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTT and UPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTTUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.00%

-76.82%

-17.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.51%

-26.78%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.69%

-48.87%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.69%

-63.94%

+14.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.76%

-76.82%

-4.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.50%

0.00%

-78.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.36%

-14.42%

-55.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.12%

6.33%

+5.79%

Volatility

TTT vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a higher volatility of 8.87% compared to ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) at 8.17%. This indicates that TTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTTUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.87%

8.17%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.79%

26.54%

-6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.35%

35.29%

-5.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.18%

50.31%

-3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.39%

53.75%

-10.36%

TTT vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTT vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

TTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, more than UPRO's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
9.43%9.87%4.86%12.15%0.34%0.00%0.29%1.88%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.67%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTT and UPRO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTT has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to UPRO (8.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTT dropped -94.00% vs UPRO's -76.82%.

On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 30.36% vs -1.30% for TTT. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, UPRO has been the lower-risk option at 8.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 30.36% return vs -1.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TTT.

TTT has the higher dividend yield at 9.43%, compared with 0.67% for UPRO.

TTT is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. TTT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%), while UPRO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TTT and 0.89% for UPRO.

UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTT and UPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer