TTT vs. FOPC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TTT (UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury) and FOPC (Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTT is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%), while FOPC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Frontier. TTT is passively managed, while FOPC is actively managed. Over the past year, TTT returned -4.00% vs 3.99% for FOPC. At a correlation of -0.85, they often move in opposite directions. TTT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for FOPC.

Performance

TTT vs. FOPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTT achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than FOPC's 0.50% return.

TTT

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -6.09%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 6M: 2.13%
• 1Y: -4.00%
• 3Y*: 10.12%
• 5Y*: 18.57%
• 10Y*: -0.85%

FOPC

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 3.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTT vs. FOPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury	0.59%	-7.89%	4.34%
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF	0.50%	6.54%	-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TTT and FOPC is -0.86, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024	-0.85

The correlation between TTT and FOPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.86 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TTT vs. FOPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTT

TTT Risk / Return Rank: 7
TTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
TTT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
TTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TTT Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FOPC

FOPC Risk / Return Rank: 41
FOPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FOPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FOPC Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FOPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FOPC Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTT vs. FOPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TTT	FOPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	1.39	-1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.00	2.05	-2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.25	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	1.83	-2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.34	5.91	-6.24

TTT vs. FOPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTT Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the FOPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTT and FOPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TTT vs. FOPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTT drawdown since its inception was -94.00%, which is greater than FOPC's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTT and FOPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTT	FOPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.00%	-2.18%	-91.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.18%	-2.18%	-20.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.91%	-0.94%	-77.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.37%	-0.44%	-69.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.89%	0.68%	+11.21%

Volatility

TTT vs. FOPC - Volatility Comparison

UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) at 0.96%. This indicates that TTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTT	FOPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.36%	0.96%	+5.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.77%	2.28%	+17.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.33%	2.89%	+25.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.02%	3.13%	+43.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.32%	3.13%	+40.19%

TTT vs. FOPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FOPC's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

TTT vs. FOPC - Dividend Comparison

TTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, more than FOPC's 4.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF	4.26%	4.42%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury	9.61%	9.87%	4.86%	12.15%	0.34%	0.00%	0.29%	1.88%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTT and FOPC in my portfolio?

TTT and FOPC have a correlation of -0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TTT or FOPC?

TTT has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to FOPC (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTT dropped -94.00% vs FOPC's -2.18%.

Which ETF is better, TTT or FOPC?

On 1-year performance, FOPC leads with 3.99% vs -4.00% for TTT. On fees, FOPC is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, FOPC has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TTT or FOPC?

Over the 1-year period, FOPC has performed better with a 3.99% return vs -4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TTT or FOPC?

FOPC is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TTT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TTT or FOPC?

TTT has the higher dividend yield at 9.61%, compared with 4.26% for FOPC.

What is the main difference between TTT and FOPC?

TTT is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while FOPC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TTT and 0.87% for FOPC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.