PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOPC vs. FARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOPC vs. FARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOPC achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than FARX's 7.40% return.


FOPC

1D
0.08%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.60%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FARX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
7.40%
6M
6.75%
1Y
16.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOPC vs. FARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FOPC
Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF
0.50%6.54%-0.20%
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
7.40%10.61%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FOPC and FARX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOPC vs. FARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOPC
FOPC Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FOPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOPC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FOPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOPC Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FARX
FARX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FARX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FARX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOPC vs. FARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOPCFARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

6.06

-4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

18.41

-12.50

FOPC vs. FARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the FARX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOPC and FARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOPC vs. FARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOPC drawdown since its inception was -2.18%, smaller than the maximum FARX drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOPC and FARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOPCFARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-5.83%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-2.80%

+0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-2.30%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

-1.05%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

0.92%

-0.24%

Volatility

FOPC vs. FARX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) is 0.96%, while Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that FOPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOPCFARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

2.33%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

5.85%

-3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89%

7.28%

-4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.13%

7.04%

-3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.13%

7.04%

-3.91%

FOPC vs. FARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOPC has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than FARX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOPC vs. FARX - Dividend Comparison

FOPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than FARX's 2.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
2.95%3.25%0.19%
FOPC
Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF
4.26%4.42%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOPC and FARX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FARX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to FOPC (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOPC dropped -2.18% vs FARX's -5.83%.

On 1-year performance, FARX leads with 16.87% vs 3.99% for FOPC. On fees, FOPC is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, FOPC has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FARX has performed better with a 16.87% return vs 3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FOPC is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FARX.

FOPC has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 2.95% for FARX.

FOPC is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while FARX is Multistrategy. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FOPC and 1.00% for FARX.

FARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOPC and FARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer