TTT vs. BITO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TTT (UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTT is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%), while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. TTT is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TTT returned 9.99%/yr vs 25.27%/yr for BITO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

TTT vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTT achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -26.37% return.

TTT

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: 3.59%
• 6M: 10.09%
• 1Y: -6.82%
• 3Y*: 9.99%
• 5Y*: 17.30%
• 10Y*: -1.20%

BITO

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: -18.61%
• YTD: -26.37%
• 6M: -30.81%
• 1Y: -41.01%
• 3Y*: 25.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTT vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury	3.59%	-7.89%	38.07%	-11.25%	150.17%	-12.29%
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-26.37%	-11.19%	104.45%	137.33%	-63.91%	-31.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TTT and BITO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021	0.01

TTT vs. BITO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TTT	BITO
Financial Services	62.5%	68.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TTT vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTT

TTT Risk / Return Rank: 6
TTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
TTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TTT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TTT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BITO

BITO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTT vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TTT	BITO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	-0.95	+0.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.13	-1.35	+1.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	0.85	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	-0.82	+0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.58	-1.41	+0.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TTT vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTT Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTT and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TTT	BITO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	-0.95	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	-0.09	-0.14

Drawdowns

TTT vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTT drawdown since its inception was -94.00%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTT and BITO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTT	BITO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.00%	-77.86%	-16.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.18%	-50.05%	+27.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.69%	-50.05%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.28%	-49.22%	-29.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.36%	-36.73%	-33.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.13%	29.09%	-16.96%

Volatility

TTT vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) is 8.69%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that TTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTT	BITO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.69%	9.43%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.48%	34.26%	-14.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.26%	43.57%	-14.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.18%	55.11%	-7.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.38%	55.11%	-11.73%

TTT vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TTT and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

TTT vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

TTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%, less than BITO's 67.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	67.63%	78.29%	61.59%	15.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury	9.34%	9.87%	4.86%	12.15%	0.34%	0.00%	0.29%	1.88%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTT and BITO in my portfolio?

TTT and BITO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TTT or BITO?

BITO has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to TTT (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTT dropped -94.00% vs BITO's -77.86%.

Which ETF is better, TTT or BITO?

On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 25.27% vs 9.99% for TTT. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TTT has been the lower-risk option at 8.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TTT or BITO?

Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 25.27% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TTT or BITO?

TTT and BITO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TTT or BITO?

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 67.63%, compared with 9.34% for TTT.

What is the main difference between TTT and BITO?

TTT is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while BITO is Cryptocurrency.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.