TTT vs. AGGA
TTT (UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury) and AGGA (Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTT is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%), while AGGA is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Astoria. TTT is passively managed, while AGGA is actively managed. Over the past year, TTT returned 16.61% vs 2.58% for AGGA. Their -0.80 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TTT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AGGA.
Performance
TTT vs. AGGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTT achieves a 16.17% return, which is significantly higher than AGGA's 0.39% return.
TTT
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 13.81%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 1Y
- 16.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 25.60%
- 10Y*
- 1.47%
- ALL TIME*
- -8.89%
AGGA
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $225.36K | $302.31K | $395.65K | |
| $399.02K | $307.25K | $386.76K |
TTT vs. AGGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury | 16.17% | 3.29% |
AGGA Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF | 0.39% | 4.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTT and AGGA is -0.79, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | -0.80 |
The correlation between TTT and AGGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTT vs. AGGA — Risk / Return Rank
TTT
AGGA
TTT vs. AGGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTT | AGGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 2.03 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 7.50 | -6.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTT vs. AGGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTT drawdown since its inception was -94.00%, which is greater than AGGA's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTT and AGGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTT | AGGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.00% | -1.47% | -92.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.51% | -1.47% | -18.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.64% | -0.96% | -74.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.43% | -0.23% | -70.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | 0.40% | +9.38% |
Volatility
TTT vs. AGGA - Volatility Comparison
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) at 0.65%. This indicates that TTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTT | AGGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 0.65% | +6.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.38% | 1.80% | +18.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.76% | 2.17% | +25.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.79% | 2.24% | +44.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.16% | 2.24% | +40.92% |
TTT vs. AGGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGA's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTT vs. AGGA - Dividend Comparison
TTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, more than AGGA's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGA Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF | 4.25% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury | 8.35% | 9.87% | 4.86% | 12.15% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 1.88% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTT and AGGA have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTT has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to AGGA (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTT dropped -94.00% vs AGGA's -1.47%.
On 1-year performance, TTT leads with 16.61% vs 2.58% for AGGA. On fees, AGGA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AGGA has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TTT has performed better with a 16.61% return vs 2.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGGA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TTT.
TTT has the higher dividend yield at 8.35%, compared with 4.25% for AGGA.
TTT is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while AGGA is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TTT and 0.55% for AGGA.
AGGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTT and AGGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer