TTOP vs. ILS
TTOP (21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTOP is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the FTSE Crypto 10 Select Index, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. TTOP is passively managed, while ILS is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. TTOP charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.
Performance
TTOP vs. ILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTOP achieves a -29.59% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 2.92% return.
TTOP
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- -32.24%
- YTD
- -29.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILS
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 7.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTOP vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTOP 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF | -29.59% | -14.90% |
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 2.92% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTOP and ILS is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTOP vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank
TTOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILS
TTOP vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF (TTOP) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTOP | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.69 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 13.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 51.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTOP vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTOP drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTOP and ILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTOP | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.86% | -2.46% | -42.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.08% | 0.00% | -40.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.54% | -0.52% | -26.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility
TTOP vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTOP | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.51% | 2.50% | +49.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.51% | 3.72% | +47.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.51% | 3.72% | +47.79% |
TTOP vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTOP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTOP vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison
TTOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 8.18% | 6.06% |
TTOP 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTOP and ILS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TTOP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TTOP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.
ILS has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for TTOP.
TTOP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TTOP and 1.58% for ILS.
Find the right allocation for TTOP and ILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer