PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTMI vs. WTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTMI vs. WTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) and Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTMI achieves a 181.23% return, which is significantly higher than WTS's 21.12% return. Over the past 10 years, TTMI has outperformed WTS with an annualized return of 37.89%, while WTS has yielded a comparatively lower 20.25% annualized return.


TTMI

1D
3.65%
1M
14.94%
YTD
181.23%
6M
164.27%
1Y
432.81%
3Y*
140.84%
5Y*
66.64%
10Y*
37.89%

WTS

1D
3.81%
1M
11.26%
YTD
21.12%
6M
19.78%
1Y
38.75%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
19.38%
10Y*
20.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTMI vs. WTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTMI
TTM Technologies, Inc.
181.23%178.79%56.55%4.84%1.21%8.01%-8.34%54.68%-37.91%14.97%
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
21.12%36.85%-1.62%43.57%-24.08%60.63%23.14%56.20%-14.13%17.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TTMI and WTS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2000

0.41

The correlation between TTMI and WTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TTMI:

$1.68

WTS:

$10.95

PE Ratio

TTMI:

115.66

WTS:

30.43

PEG Ratio

TTMI:

1.61

WTS:

1.42

PS Ratio

TTMI:

7.06

WTS:

4.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTMI:

$2.91B

WTS:

$2.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTMI:

$590.75M

WTS:

$1.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

TTMI:

$402.84M

WTS:

$556.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTMI vs. WTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTMI
TTMI Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TTMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TTMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

WTS
WTS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
WTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
WTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTMI vs. WTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) and Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTMIWTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.30

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.76

2.52

+16.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

53.30

6.51

+46.79

TTMI vs. WTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTMI Sharpe Ratio is 5.99, which is higher than the WTS Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTMI and WTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTMI vs. WTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTMI drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, which is greater than WTS's maximum drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTMI and WTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTMIWTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.68%

-63.68%

-31.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.26%

-15.45%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.24%

-19.54%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.69%

-44.08%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.19%

-44.08%

-12.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-0.55%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.82%

-16.19%

-33.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.17%

5.97%

+2.20%

Volatility

TTMI vs. WTS - Volatility Comparison

TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) has a higher volatility of 22.89% compared to Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) at 7.01%. This indicates that TTMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTMIWTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.89%

7.01%

+15.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.82%

16.66%

+42.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.82%

23.03%

+49.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.51%

27.84%

+21.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.57%

28.24%

+17.33%

Dividends

TTMI vs. WTS - Dividend Comparison

TTMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TTMI
TTM Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
0.66%0.72%0.81%0.66%0.79%0.52%0.76%0.90%1.27%0.99%1.09%1.33%

Financials

TTMI vs. WTS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TTM Technologies, Inc. and Watts Water Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


450.00M500.00M550.00M600.00M650.00M700.00M750.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
774.32M
677.30M
(TTMI) Total Revenue
(WTS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TTMI vs. WTS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TTM Technologies, Inc. and Watts Water Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
20.0%
48.2%
Portfolio components
TTMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTM Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 154.94M and revenue of 774.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

WTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.10M and revenue of 677.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

TTMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTM Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 76.92M and revenue of 774.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

WTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 133.00M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.

TTMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTM Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 50.69M and revenue of 774.32M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

WTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 99.60M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTMI and WTS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTMI has higher volatility (22.89%) compared to WTS (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTMI dropped -94.68% vs WTS's -63.68%.

TTMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.99 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTMI and WTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer