TTMI vs. KGC
TTMI (TTM Technologies, Inc.) and KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. TTMI operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while KGC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, TTMI returned 37.89%/yr vs 18.81%/yr for KGC. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TTMI vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTMI achieves a 181.23% return, which is significantly higher than KGC's -8.92% return. Over the past 10 years, TTMI has outperformed KGC with an annualized return of 37.89%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively lower 18.81% annualized return.
TTMI
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- 14.94%
- YTD
- 181.23%
- 6M
- 164.27%
- 1Y
- 432.81%
- 3Y*
- 140.84%
- 5Y*
- 66.64%
- 10Y*
- 37.89%
KGC
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -18.08%
- YTD
- -8.92%
- 6M
- -8.14%
- 1Y
- 65.63%
- 3Y*
- 76.13%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
TTMI vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTMI TTM Technologies, Inc. | 181.23% | 178.79% | 56.55% | 4.84% | 1.21% | 8.01% | -8.34% | 54.68% | -37.91% | 14.97% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | -8.92% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTMI and KGC is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2000 | 0.12 |
The correlation between TTMI and KGC shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TTMI:
$1.68
KGC:
$2.35
TTMI:
115.66
KGC:
10.87
TTMI:
1.61
KGC:
0.14
TTMI:
7.06
KGC:
3.92
TTMI:
$2.91B
KGC:
$7.94B
TTMI:
$590.75M
KGC:
$4.19B
TTMI:
$402.84M
KGC:
$5.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTMI vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
TTMI
KGC
TTMI vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTMI | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.24 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.76 | 1.75 | +17.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 53.30 | 5.20 | +48.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTMI vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTMI drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, roughly equal to the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTMI and KGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTMI | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.68% | -96.00% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.26% | -37.69% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.24% | -37.69% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.69% | -59.29% | +23.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.19% | -67.75% | +11.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -32.63% | +31.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.82% | -57.60% | +7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.17% | 12.66% | -4.49% |
Volatility
TTMI vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) has a higher volatility of 22.89% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 18.21%. This indicates that TTMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTMI | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.89% | 18.21% | +4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.82% | 40.59% | +18.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.82% | 51.35% | +21.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.51% | 44.22% | +5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.57% | 47.01% | -1.44% |
Dividends
TTMI vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
TTMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.57% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% |
TTMI TTM Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TTMI vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TTM Technologies, Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TTMI vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison
TTMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTM Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 154.94M and revenue of 774.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
KGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.
TTMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTM Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 76.92M and revenue of 774.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
KGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
TTMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTM Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 50.69M and revenue of 774.32M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
KGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 831.32M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTMI and KGC have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTMI has higher volatility (22.89%) compared to KGC (18.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTMI dropped -94.68% vs KGC's -96.00%.
TTMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.99 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTMI and KGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer