TTIRX vs. FRQHX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TTIRX (Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Retirement Class) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TTIRX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.

Performance

TTIRX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Retirement Class (TTIRX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TTIRX

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: -0.55%
• 6M: 6.95%
• YTD: 10.00%
• 1Y: 21.33%
• 3Y*: 16.43%
• 5Y*: 9.50%
• 10Y*: 11.50%
• ALL TIME*: 9.84%

FRQHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TTIRX Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Retirement Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TTIRX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TTIRX Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Retirement Class	10.00%	20.66%	15.08%	20.42%	-17.80%	17.09%	16.94%	8.20%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.71%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	4.04%	9.80%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TTIRX and FRQHX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.77

The correlation between TTIRX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TTIRX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TTIRX

TTIRX Risk / Return Rank: 60
TTIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
TTIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
TTIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
TTIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TTIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TTIRX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Retirement Class (TTIRX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TTIRX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.19	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	TTIRX	FRQHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TTIRX	FRQHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.77%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.83%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.71%	—	—

TTIRX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTIRX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

TTIRX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

TTIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	2.93%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TTIRX Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Retirement Class	2.30%	2.53%	1.97%	1.93%	2.05%	1.80%	1.47%	2.02%	2.38%	0.11%	2.21%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTIRX and FRQHX in my portfolio?

TTIRX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.