TTIFX vs. CRDBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX).
TTIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 30, 2014. CRDBX is managed by Potomac Fund Management Inc.. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020.
Performance
TTIFX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TTIFX vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund | 0.19% | 6.79% | -2.91% | 6.04% | 0.93% | 8.25% | 2.25% |
CRDBX Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund | 1.84% | 25.36% | 19.91% | 18.44% | -8.22% | 28.08% | 24.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTIFX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's 1.84% return.
TTIFX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- —
CRDBX
- 1D
- 4.87%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 36.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TTIFX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTIFX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TTIFX vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank
TTIFX
CRDBX
TTIFX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTIFX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.76 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 3.26 | -1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.61 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 5.17 | -3.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 16.62 | -8.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTIFX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.76 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.01 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.01 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between TTIFX and CRDBX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TTIFX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison
TTIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than CRDBX's 15.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund | 3.00% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 5.33% | 0.84% | 2.02% | 4.71% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.94% |
CRDBX Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund | 15.08% | 15.36% | 12.58% | 9.91% | 0.18% | 25.05% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TTIFX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTIFX drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -97.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTIFX and CRDBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTIFX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.21% | -97.00% | +83.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -7.13% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.04% | -97.00% | +87.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -95.71% | +93.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -25.67% | +23.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 2.22% | -1.58% |
Volatility
TTIFX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) is 1.12%, while Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that TTIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TTIFX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 5.18% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.84% | 10.66% | -8.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 21.01% | -16.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 1,635.86% | -1,629.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.93% | 1,525.82% | -1,519.89% |