PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTI vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTI vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTI achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 243.32% return. Over the past 10 years, TTI has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 4.29%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 54.18% annualized return.


TTI

1D
0.32%
1M
-9.57%
6M
-4.26%
YTD
0.85%
1Y
163.97%
3Y*
35.25%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
4.29%

MU

1D
-1.24%
1M
-1.65%
6M
183.94%
YTD
243.32%
1Y
687.66%
3Y*
149.71%
5Y*
66.39%
10Y*
54.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTI vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
0.85%161.73%-20.80%30.64%21.83%229.66%-56.05%16.67%-60.66%-12.29%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
243.32%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TTI and MU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 1990

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TTI:

$1.38B

MU:

$1.11T

EPS

TTI:

$0.05

MU:

$44.42

PE Ratio

TTI:

175.80

MU:

22.05

PEG Ratio

TTI:

0.21

MU:

0.08

PS Ratio

TTI:

2.03

MU:

12.33

PB Ratio

TTI:

4.52

MU:

11.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTI:

$630.05M

MU:

$90.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTI:

$154.82M

MU:

$65.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

TTI:

$85.97M

MU:

$44.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTI vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTI
TTI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTI vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTIMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.69

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

23.23

-18.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.39

83.25

-72.87

TTI vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 9.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTI and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTI vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTI drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTI and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTIMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.27%

-98.25%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.66%

-30.28%

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.43%

-57.63%

-9.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.43%

-57.63%

-9.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.60%

-57.63%

-38.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.79%

-19.29%

-49.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.76%

-58.07%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.58%

8.43%

+7.15%

Volatility

TTI vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) is 18.20%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.63%. This indicates that TTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTIMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.20%

33.63%

-15.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.30%

62.19%

-18.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.32%

75.68%

-18.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.35%

54.75%

+6.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.37%

50.65%

+24.72%

Dividends

TTI vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

TTI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.34%

Financials

TTI vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
156.25M
41.46B
(TTI) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TTI vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
24.5%
84.6%
Portfolio components
TTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.23M and revenue of 156.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

TTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.82M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.

TTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 8.32M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTI and MU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to TTI (18.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTI dropped -99.27% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTI and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer