PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTI vs. CIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTI vs. CIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) and Bancolombia S.A. (CIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTI achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than CIB's 34.93% return. Over the past 10 years, TTI has underperformed CIB with an annualized return of 4.29%, while CIB has yielded a comparatively higher 16.12% annualized return.


TTI

1D
0.32%
1M
-9.57%
6M
-4.26%
YTD
0.85%
1Y
163.97%
3Y*
35.25%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
4.29%

CIB

1D
2.50%
1M
4.33%
6M
21.33%
YTD
34.93%
1Y
94.06%
3Y*
60.83%
5Y*
34.39%
10Y*
16.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTI vs. CIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
0.85%161.73%-20.80%30.64%21.83%229.66%-56.05%16.67%-60.66%-12.29%
CIB
Bancolombia S.A.
34.93%124.16%13.78%22.08%-0.31%-20.69%-22.31%47.45%-0.72%11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TTI and CIB is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 1995

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TTI:

$1.38B

CIB:

$19.68B

EPS

TTI:

$0.05

CIB:

COP 29.23K

PE Ratio

TTI:

175.80

CIB:

9.32

PEG Ratio

TTI:

0.21

CIB:

0.55

PS Ratio

TTI:

2.03

CIB:

1.50

PB Ratio

TTI:

4.52

CIB:

1.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTI:

$630.05M

CIB:

COP 43.34T

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTI:

$154.82M

CIB:

COP 25.71T

EBITDA (TTM)

TTI:

$85.97M

CIB:

COP 10.37T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTI vs. CIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTI
TTI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CIB
CIB Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTI vs. CIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) and Bancolombia S.A. (CIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTICIBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

3.86

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.39

9.55

+0.84

TTI vs. CIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the CIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTI and CIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTI vs. CIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTI drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than CIB's maximum drawdown of -93.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTI and CIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTICIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.27%

-93.77%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.66%

-23.95%

-13.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.43%

-23.95%

-43.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.43%

-46.85%

-20.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.60%

-70.38%

-26.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.79%

0.00%

-68.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.76%

-32.56%

-23.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.58%

9.67%

+5.91%

Volatility

TTI vs. CIB - Volatility Comparison

TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) has a higher volatility of 18.20% compared to Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) at 8.33%. This indicates that TTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTICIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.20%

8.33%

+9.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.30%

26.94%

+16.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.32%

32.15%

+25.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.35%

32.68%

+28.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.37%

35.68%

+39.69%

Dividends

TTI vs. CIB - Dividend Comparison

TTI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIB
Bancolombia S.A.
3.04%6.90%10.96%10.92%10.68%0.87%4.01%2.41%3.62%3.21%3.21%4.49%
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.34%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TTI vs. CIB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Bancolombia S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T10.00T12.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
156.25M
10.46T
(TTI) Total Revenue
(CIB) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TTI values in USD, CIB values in COP

TTI vs. CIB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Bancolombia S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
24.5%
59.2%
Portfolio components
TTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.23M and revenue of 156.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

CIB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a gross profit of 6.19T and revenue of 10.46T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.

TTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.82M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

CIB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported an operating income of 2.15T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

TTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 8.32M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

CIB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a net income of 1.46T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTI and CIB have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTI has higher volatility (18.20%) compared to CIB (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTI dropped -99.27% vs CIB's -93.77%.

CIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTI and CIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer