TTEC vs. CSV
TTEC (TTEC Holdings, Inc.) and CSV (Carriage Services, Inc.) are both stocks. TTEC operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while CSV operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, TTEC returned -21.05%/yr vs 6.78%/yr for CSV. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TTEC vs. CSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTEC achieves a -42.92% return, which is significantly lower than CSV's -11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, TTEC has underperformed CSV with an annualized return of -21.05%, while CSV has yielded a comparatively higher 6.78% annualized return.
TTEC
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -21.26%
- YTD
- -42.92%
- 6M
- -43.23%
- 1Y
- -57.19%
- 3Y*
- -60.06%
- 5Y*
- -53.50%
- 10Y*
- -21.05%
CSV
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -15.43%
- YTD
- -11.20%
- 6M
- -11.26%
- 1Y
- -14.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- 6.78%
TTEC vs. CSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTEC TTEC Holdings, Inc. | -42.92% | -27.86% | -76.84% | -49.06% | -50.44% | 25.33% | 92.31% | 40.78% | -27.64% | 33.76% |
CSV Carriage Services, Inc. | -11.20% | 7.27% | 61.83% | -7.71% | -56.70% | 107.92% | 24.25% | 67.51% | -38.90% | -9.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTEC and CSV is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 1996 | 0.18 |
The correlation between TTEC and CSV shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TTEC:
$99.83M
CSV:
$589.82M
TTEC:
-$4.17
CSV:
$2.81
TTEC:
0.05
CSV:
1.41
TTEC:
0.98
CSV:
2.21
TTEC:
$2.10B
CSV:
$416.49M
TTEC:
$324.37M
CSV:
$147.10M
TTEC:
-$78.08M
CSV:
$108.36M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTEC vs. CSV — Risk / Return Rank
TTEC
CSV
TTEC vs. CSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) and Carriage Services, Inc. (CSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTEC | CSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.93 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.53 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | -1.32 | -0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTEC vs. CSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTEC drawdown since its inception was -98.05%, roughly equal to the maximum CSV drawdown of -95.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTEC and CSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTEC | CSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.05% | -95.90% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.29% | -27.58% | -34.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.94% | -40.56% | -53.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.05% | -68.52% | -29.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.05% | -68.52% | -29.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.05% | -39.76% | -58.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.46% | -51.39% | -2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.27% | 11.13% | +31.14% |
Volatility
TTEC vs. CSV - Volatility Comparison
TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) has a higher volatility of 18.59% compared to Carriage Services, Inc. (CSV) at 10.83%. This indicates that TTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTEC | CSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.59% | 10.83% | +7.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.57% | 19.84% | +41.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.23% | 26.07% | +59.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.20% | 36.84% | +34.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.92% | 36.95% | +19.97% |
Dividends
TTEC vs. CSV - Dividend Comparison
TTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSV Carriage Services, Inc. | 1.20% | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.80% | 1.63% | 0.64% | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.94% | 0.88% | 0.52% | 0.41% |
TTEC TTEC Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 4.80% | 2.31% | 0.99% | 3.95% | 1.56% | 1.93% | 1.17% | 1.26% | 1.29% |
Financials
TTEC vs. CSV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TTEC Holdings, Inc. and Carriage Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TTEC vs. CSV - Profitability Comparison
TTEC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTEC Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 496.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CSV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carriage Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.64M and revenue of 106.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.
TTEC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTEC Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.50M and revenue of 496.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
CSV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carriage Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 25.28M and revenue of 106.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.
TTEC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TTEC Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -7.61M and revenue of 496.18M, resulting in a net margin of -1.5%.
CSV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carriage Services, Inc. reported a net income of 13.49M and revenue of 106.12M, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTEC and CSV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTEC has higher volatility (18.59%) compared to CSV (10.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTEC dropped -98.05% vs CSV's -95.90%.
CSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTEC and CSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer