TTAPY vs. UCBJY
TTAPY (TTW Public Company Limited) and UCBJY (UCB SA ADR) are both stocks. TTAPY operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities), while UCBJY operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, TTAPY returned 5.03%/yr vs 15.08%/yr for UCBJY. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TTAPY vs. UCBJY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAPY achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than UCBJY's -2.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TTAPY has underperformed UCBJY with an annualized return of 5.03%, while UCBJY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.08% annualized return.
TTAPY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 20.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
UCBJY
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -14.37%
- 6M
- -7.72%
- YTD
- -2.13%
- 1Y
- 36.42%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
TTAPY vs. UCBJY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAPY TTW Public Company Limited | 2.61% | 23.94% | 7.75% | 9.43% | -21.49% | -12.78% | -2.99% | 21.66% | 3.29% | 33.12% |
UCBJY UCB SA ADR | -2.13% | 42.69% | 129.19% | 12.67% | -30.04% | 6.90% | 34.46% | -1.59% | 9.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAPY and UCBJY is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
TTAPY:
$1.21B
UCBJY:
$51.74B
TTAPY:
THB 40.77
UCBJY:
€6.73
TTAPY:
12.35
UCBJY:
17.67
TTAPY:
58.83
UCBJY:
0.40
TTAPY:
7.68
UCBJY:
3.33
TTAPY:
2.32
UCBJY:
4.25
TTAPY:
THB 5.23B
UCBJY:
€13.86B
TTAPY:
THB 3.58B
UCBJY:
€10.00B
TTAPY:
THB 4.52B
UCBJY:
€4.56B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAPY vs. UCBJY — Risk / Return Rank
TTAPY
UCBJY
TTAPY vs. UCBJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TTW Public Company Limited (TTAPY) and UCB SA ADR (UCBJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTAPY | UCBJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.21 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.64 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.91 | 3.76 | +1.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTAPY vs. UCBJY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAPY drawdown since its inception was -37.48%, smaller than the maximum UCBJY drawdown of -50.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAPY and UCBJY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAPY | UCBJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.48% | -50.32% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -21.77% | +13.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.45% | -28.58% | +19.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.60% | -46.82% | +23.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.48% | -50.32% | +12.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.25% | -18.68% | +12.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -13.14% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 9.46% | -5.31% |
Volatility
TTAPY vs. UCBJY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TTW Public Company Limited (TTAPY) is 0.70%, while UCB SA ADR (UCBJY) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that TTAPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCBJY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTAPY | UCBJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | 11.40% | -10.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 24.62% | -12.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.81% | 35.55% | -12.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 30.42% | -13.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 30.71% | -7.23% |
Dividends
TTAPY vs. UCBJY - Dividend Comparison
TTAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than UCBJY's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAPY TTW Public Company Limited | 6.28% | 5.97% | 6.51% | 6.61% | 6.87% | 5.48% | 4.10% | 1.85% | 4.02% | 4.44% | 5.87% | 3.40% |
UCBJY UCB SA ADR | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.73% | 1.67% | 1.79% | 0.86% | 0.78% | 1.06% | 1.10% | 2.71% | 3.21% | 0.00% |
Financials
TTAPY vs. UCBJY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TTW Public Company Limited and UCB SA ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TTAPY vs. UCBJY - Profitability Comparison
TTAPY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TTW Public Company Limited reported a gross profit of 886.58M and revenue of 1.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.
UCBJY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UCB SA ADR reported a gross profit of 3.04B and revenue of 4.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.
TTAPY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TTW Public Company Limited reported an operating income of 819.44M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 63.2%.
UCBJY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UCB SA ADR reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.
TTAPY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TTW Public Company Limited reported a net income of 672.94M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.
UCBJY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UCB SA ADR reported a net income of 1.07B and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in a net margin of 25.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTAPY and UCBJY have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCBJY has higher volatility (11.40%) compared to TTAPY (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAPY dropped -37.48% vs UCBJY's -50.32%.
UCBJY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTAPY and UCBJY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer