TTAN vs. NTRA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TTAN (ServiceTitan, Inc) and NTRA (Natera, Inc.) are both stocks. TTAN operates in Software - Application (Technology), while NTRA operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past year, TTAN returned -38.26% vs 37.79% for NTRA. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TTAN vs. NTRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ServiceTitan, Inc (TTAN) and Natera, Inc. (NTRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAN achieves a -39.73% return, which is significantly lower than NTRA's 2.48% return.

TTAN

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: -39.73%
• 6M: -41.59%
• 1Y: -38.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NTRA

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: 15.54%
• YTD: 2.48%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 37.79%
• 3Y*: 65.95%
• 5Y*: 14.42%
• 10Y*: 33.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTAN vs. NTRA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TTAN ServiceTitan, Inc	-39.73%	3.53%	1.85%
NTRA Natera, Inc.	2.48%	44.72%	-5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TTAN and NTRA is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024	0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap TTAN : $6.10B NTRA : $33.22B
EPS TTAN : -$246.61 NTRA : -$1.64
PS Ratio TTAN : 0.02 NTRA : 12.95
PB Ratio TTAN : 0.00 NTRA : 18.73
Total Revenue (TTM) TTAN : $269.57B NTRA : $2.50B
Gross Profit (TTM) TTAN : $194.32B NTRA : $1.63B
EBITDA (TTM) TTAN : -$25.80B NTRA : -$294.86M

Return for Risk

TTAN vs. NTRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTAN

TTAN Risk / Return Rank: 13
TTAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
TTAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TTAN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
TTAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
TTAN Martin Ratio Rank: 13

NTRA

NTRA Risk / Return Rank: 66
NTRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
NTRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
NTRA Omega Ratio Rank: 63
NTRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
NTRA Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTAN vs. NTRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ServiceTitan, Inc (TTAN) and Natera, Inc. (NTRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TTAN	NTRA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	0.88	-1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.96	1.37	-2.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.17	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	1.35	-2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	2.80	-4.05

TTAN vs. NTRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAN Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the NTRA Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAN and NTRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TTAN vs. NTRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAN drawdown since its inception was -57.26%, smaller than the maximum NTRA drawdown of -77.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAN and NTRA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTAN	NTRA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.26%	-77.74%	+20.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.78%	-28.20%	-25.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-77.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-77.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.38%	-7.72%	-42.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.02%	-33.38%	+9.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.73%	13.52%	+17.21%

Volatility

TTAN vs. NTRA - Volatility Comparison

ServiceTitan, Inc (TTAN) has a higher volatility of 19.50% compared to Natera, Inc. (NTRA) at 12.58%. This indicates that TTAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTAN	NTRA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.50%	12.58%	+6.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.13%	35.53%	+6.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.38%	43.14%	+8.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.68%	57.02%	-6.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.68%	60.82%	-10.14%

Dividends

TTAN vs. NTRA - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTAN nor NTRA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TTAN vs. NTRA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ServiceTitan, Inc and Natera, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TTAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported a gross profit of 193.79B and revenue of 268.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.

NTRA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.44M and revenue of 696.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.8%.

TTAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported an operating income of -25.76B and revenue of 268.82B, resulting in an operating margin of -9.6%.

NTRA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported an operating income of -93.52M and revenue of 696.64M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.4%.

TTAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported a net income of -22.82B and revenue of 268.82B, resulting in a net margin of -8.5%.

NTRA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natera, Inc. reported a net income of -85.09M and revenue of 696.64M, resulting in a net margin of -12.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTAN and NTRA in my portfolio?

TTAN and NTRA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TTAN or NTRA?

TTAN has higher volatility (19.50%) compared to NTRA (12.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAN dropped -57.26% vs NTRA's -77.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NTRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.