TT vs. CIEN
TT (Trane Technologies plc) and CIEN (Ciena Corporation) are both stocks. TT operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while CIEN operates in Communication Equipment (Technology). Over the past 10 years, TT returned 23.76%/yr vs 35.80%/yr for CIEN. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TT vs. CIEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TT achieves a 18.29% return, which is significantly lower than CIEN's 90.70% return. Over the past 10 years, TT has underperformed CIEN with an annualized return of 23.76%, while CIEN has yielded a comparatively higher 35.80% annualized return.
TT
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 37.71%
- 5Y*
- 21.39%
- 10Y*
- 23.76%
CIEN
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -22.83%
- YTD
- 90.70%
- 6M
- 104.17%
- 1Y
- 501.62%
- 3Y*
- 119.10%
- 5Y*
- 49.92%
- 10Y*
- 35.80%
TT vs. CIEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TT Trane Technologies plc | 18.29% | 6.38% | 52.97% | 47.39% | -15.34% | 41.02% | 11.26% | 48.32% | 4.41% | 21.27% |
CIEN Ciena Corporation | 90.70% | 175.76% | 88.42% | -11.71% | -33.77% | 45.64% | 23.80% | 25.89% | 62.02% | -14.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TT and CIEN is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 1997 | 0.35 |
The correlation between TT and CIEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TT:
$102.24B
CIEN:
$65.25B
TT:
$12.94
CIEN:
$3.01
TT:
35.43
CIEN:
148.07
TT:
4.75
CIEN:
11.65
TT:
11.87
CIEN:
22.56
TT:
$21.60B
CIEN:
$5.57B
TT:
$7.76B
CIEN:
$2.40B
TT:
$4.25B
CIEN:
$670.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TT vs. CIEN — Risk / Return Rank
TT
CIEN
TT vs. CIEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TT | CIEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.72 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 16.49 | -16.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 76.44 | -75.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TT vs. CIEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TT drawdown since its inception was -77.91%, smaller than the maximum CIEN drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TT and CIEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TT | CIEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.91% | -99.51% | +21.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.97% | -30.68% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.44% | -45.51% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.53% | -49.54% | +9.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.13% | -49.54% | -1.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.75% | -57.38% | +50.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | -87.08% | +72.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.12% | 6.61% | +3.51% |
Volatility
TT vs. CIEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trane Technologies plc (TT) is 9.05%, while Ciena Corporation (CIEN) has a volatility of 24.81%. This indicates that TT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TT | CIEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 24.81% | -15.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.82% | 56.12% | -34.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.50% | 66.74% | -39.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.38% | 48.55% | -21.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.34% | 44.35% | -16.01% |
Dividends
TT vs. CIEN - Dividend Comparison
TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while CIEN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIEN Ciena Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TT Trane Technologies plc | 0.87% | 0.97% | 0.91% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 2.10% |
Financials
TT vs. CIEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trane Technologies plc and Ciena Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TT vs. CIEN - Profitability Comparison
TT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
CIEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a gross profit of 691.55M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
TT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 776.10M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
CIEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported an operating income of 237.87M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.
TT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 584.40M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
CIEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a net income of 218.22M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TT and CIEN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIEN has higher volatility (24.81%) compared to TT (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TT dropped -77.91% vs CIEN's -99.51%.
CIEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.58 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TT and CIEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer