TSYY vs. SDTY
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and SDTY (YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -5.48% vs 21.67% for SDTY. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SDTY.
Performance
TSYY vs. SDTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -17.16% return, which is significantly lower than SDTY's 6.19% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- -17.16%
- 6M
- -17.01%
- 1Y
- -5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDTY
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 21.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY vs. SDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -17.16% | -22.69% |
SDTY YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 6.19% | 9.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and SDTY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.52 |
The correlation between TSYY and SDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. SDTY — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
SDTY
TSYY vs. SDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSYY | SDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.36 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 2.71 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 11.38 | -11.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSYY | SDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 1.94 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 0.73 | -1.32 |
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. SDTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than SDTY's maximum drawdown of -18.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and SDTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | SDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.52% | -18.63% | -22.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.39% | -8.02% | -20.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.12% | -2.70% | -34.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.98% | -3.02% | -22.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.71% | 1.91% | +12.80% |
Volatility
TSYY vs. SDTY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) at 3.44%. This indicates that TSYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | SDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 3.44% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.90% | 8.74% | +11.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.52% | 11.23% | +20.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.51% | 16.85% | +20.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.51% | 16.85% | +20.66% |
TSYY vs. SDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYY vs. SDTY - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 278.11%, more than SDTY's 26.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SDTY YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 26.00% | 22.00% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 278.11% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYY and SDTY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSYY has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to SDTY (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs SDTY's -18.63%.
On 1-year performance, SDTY leads with 21.67% vs -5.48% for TSYY. On fees, TSYY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, SDTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SDTY has performed better with a 21.67% return vs -5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSYY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SDTY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 278.11%, compared with 26.00% for SDTY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYY and 1.01% for SDTY.
SDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and SDTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer