PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSYY vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSYY vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -20.53% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 12.87% return.


TSYY

1D
-2.37%
1M
-5.02%
6M
-19.96%
YTD
-20.53%
1Y
-15.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-24.10%

QQQY

1D
-0.07%
1M
-4.79%
6M
11.42%
YTD
12.87%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSYY vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
-20.53%-15.96%-3.30%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
12.87%14.96%-4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TSYY and QQQY is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024

0.58

The correlation between TSYY and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSYY vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSYY
TSYY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TSYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSYY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TSYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSYY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSYY vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSYYQQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.25

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

1.97

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.90

7.58

-8.48

TSYY vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSYY Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSYY and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSYY vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSYYQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.52%

-19.05%

-22.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.54%

-11.14%

-18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.68%

-5.55%

-34.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.72%

-2.92%

-23.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.09%

2.89%

+14.20%

Volatility

TSYY vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) have volatilities of 7.13% and 7.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSYYQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

7.08%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.18%

14.66%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.15%

16.75%

+13.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.66%

15.57%

+21.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.66%

15.57%

+21.09%

TSYY vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSYY has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSYY vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 250.98%, more than QQQY's 37.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
37.35%45.34%83.34%20.64%
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
250.98%256.64%0.19%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSYY and QQQY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSYY has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to QQQY (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 21.87% vs -15.32% for TSYY. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 21.87% return vs -15.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.

TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 250.98%, compared with 37.35% for QQQY.

TSYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSYY and 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSYY and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer