PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSYY vs. PLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSYY vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -20.53% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -31.53% return.


TSYY

1D
-2.37%
1M
-5.02%
6M
-19.96%
YTD
-20.53%
1Y
-15.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-24.10%

PLTW

1D
2.24%
1M
5.40%
6M
-28.11%
YTD
-31.53%
1Y
-22.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSYY vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
-20.53%-22.82%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-31.53%28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TSYY and PLTW is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSYY vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSYY
TSYY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TSYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSYY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TSYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSYY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSYY vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSYYPLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.98

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.39

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.90

-0.73

-0.16

TSYY vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSYY Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSYY and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSYY vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and PLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSYYPLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.52%

-57.27%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.54%

-57.27%

+27.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.68%

-44.00%

+4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.72%

-24.60%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.09%

30.10%

-13.01%

Volatility

TSYY vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) is 7.13%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 18.74%. This indicates that TSYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSYYPLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

18.74%

-11.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.18%

48.11%

-29.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.15%

61.79%

-31.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.66%

73.64%

-36.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.66%

73.64%

-36.98%

TSYY vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSYY has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSYY vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 250.98%, more than PLTW's 128.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
128.07%72.40%0.00%
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
250.98%256.64%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSYY and PLTW have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (18.74%) compared to TSYY (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

On 1-year performance, TSYY leads with -15.32% vs -22.07% for PLTW. On fees, PLTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 7.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSYY has performed better with a -15.32% return vs -22.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.

TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 250.98%, compared with 128.07% for PLTW.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSYY and 0.99% for PLTW.

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSYY and PLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer