TSYY vs. NVYY
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVYY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -12.29% vs 31.22% for NVYY. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for NVYY.
Performance
TSYY vs. NVYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -16.60% return, which is significantly lower than NVYY's 4.60% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -16.60%
- 6M
- -16.47%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVYY
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY vs. NVYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -16.60% | 8.95% |
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 4.60% | 31.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and NVYY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. NVYY — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
NVYY
TSYY vs. NVYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSYY | NVYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.24 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 2.10 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 4.82 | -5.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSYY | NVYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 1.29 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 1.48 | -2.06 |
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. NVYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than NVYY's maximum drawdown of -14.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and NVYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | NVYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.52% | -14.90% | -26.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.31% | -14.90% | -12.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.69% | -4.86% | -31.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -5.00% | -20.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.49% | 6.50% | +7.99% |
Volatility
TSYY vs. NVYY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) have volatilities of 4.86% and 4.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | NVYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 4.65% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 16.78% | +2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.77% | 24.28% | +7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 24.10% | +13.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 24.10% | +13.42% |
TSYY vs. NVYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NVYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYY vs. NVYY - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 282.79%, more than NVYY's 147.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 147.62% | 75.30% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 282.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYY and NVYY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSYY has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to NVYY (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs NVYY's -14.90%.
On 1-year performance, NVYY leads with 31.22% vs -12.29% for TSYY. On fees, TSYY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NVYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVYY has performed better with a 31.22% return vs -12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSYY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NVYY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 147.62% for NVYY.
TSYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVYY is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYY and 1.07% for NVYY.
NVYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and NVYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer